sd'sker
Banned
seven years. and what do we have to show for it? a team that does as well as the second year with just a terrible schedule.I am so sick of this argument. Because Bo is let go for getting blown out against ranked opponents, we would be asking a new coach to come in and go undefeated? Why? Why the jump from 4 losses to undefeated? Why do people have to blow the situation out of proportion like this?The problem isn't the 9 wins or the 4 losses. Some need to get that through their thick heads. The problem is not being competitive with reasonably decent teams. Period. As far as I'm concerned the new coach can come in here and only win 9 for a few years, as long as he's not struggling with McNeese and getting curb stomped by every top 30 team he faces. The expectation is not a better record than Pelini has generated. The expectation is winning some games that matter instead of getting embarrassed. It's really that simple.Something to consider. We would be asking a new coach to come in and go undefeated. Right away. Now. We're still in the B1G, right? And you can talk all you want about how it's not about wins and losses. Coaches know better. Put what you wrote above in the first line of the job description.......For the 11-2 group, are you truly satisfied with the season, the whole 7 years? Is it what you expect from Nebraska?
bo has had seven years to bring home a championship and instead his teams struggle to tackle and allow rushing records to be set. new snarky hashtag: #defensiveguru
Last edited by a moderator: