During Harvey's time at the microphone today, he said something that made me scratch my head a bit.
He said we should all respect Tom's reasons for leaving the AD post.
Which made me think, "Why wouldn't we respect his reasons?"
And then I thought about it again, and the question seemed even more valid.
Today, after hearing about the news of the conference and the immeidate speculation that TO might retire, I thought the timing seemed a bit weird. We are just about to start conference play. There's a big game on Saturday. TO would not make a distraction by pointing a finger toward himself.
Ok, now, here comes the potentially crazy part.
We all know that there is some uncertainty, due to the UCLA result, about how we might perform in league play. It is possible that we could go on a slide.
Tom must have comunicated to the boosters that he has patience with Bo and wants to give him every chance to succeed.
Maybe the boosters feel that, given certain outcomes, they would like to make a change at HC, but would be somehow hamstrung by Tom's reluctance to go along with it.
Maybe the boosters would, in the situation of a coach replacement, want to go after a splashy hire for more money and fear that Tom would be against it.
Encouraging TO to retire now, before there are any bad results on the football field, would make it look better for the boosters. No one would feel that they are throwing out a legend because the football program is struggling.
If we suck in league play now, they can say that TO was on his way to retirement already and avoid any appearance that his leaving had anything to do with the results of 2012 football games.
Does any of this hold water? Or do I have a very over active imagination?