Back to the discussion, listened to some of it at my desk, and there are two things that came out that I feel are glaring red flags. One for the program, one for the press.
A direct quote from Steve Sipple: "I was pro Solich, I was pro-Callahan and I'm Pro Bo. And I am because I see them as underdogs because Tom Osborne was 60-3 and they have to perform with that hangin over their heads."
-Yeah that's the biggest straw man argument ever, Steve. Further, is that an admission that you can't be unbiased in your covering of the team you're paid to cover? Because that's kinda what it sounds like.
The other disconcerting tidbit was a general agreement from all in the table that S&C wasn't what should be. One of the chief reasons, which I believe came from Rose's father, said that "coach makes them be accountable". Which to me is just alarming as all Hell. I get the idea, "We're making responsible men here. Can't have anyone babysitting you in life boys..." but here is yet another very important aspect of Bo Pelini's job, that is very key to his team performance, and therefore his salary, that's he's essentially neglecting. Go watch the 60 minutes segment on Alabama's S&C coach. There is no reason a S&C coach on the payroll cannot be on these guys if there's perceived slacking going on. Teach these guys accountability other ways. Demand a coat and tie on the road and at players' banquets. More philanthropic work. Christ anything just please don't leave one of the fundamental blocks in a successful program "up to the kids", that just reeks of bad management.