This one will probably be close. If we win, it is because we have outplayed a more talented team. We pulled that off against clemson (decisively if you take away the dumb turnovers). but VT will come out firing. You know this will be nationally televised as we will both be undefeated and ranked going into this game.
Also, sure, you can say that we "should have" beaten Texas Tech (and I agree with that), but conversely, if we had been in TT's shoes we would be saying "we should have won by 20" and you know they are probably saying the same thing. Clemson is probably saying that they should have won, and we are saying we should have beaten them by a lot. It doesn't make sense to me to reference the TT game when talking about playing Virginia Tech next year.
VT will be more talented at some positions, but not at others and at home they will be ready. I bet this game will be just as close as last year's game, but it will be lower scoring, played more ACC style than high flying BIG 12 style.
Also, sure, you can say that we "should have" beaten Texas Tech (and I agree with that), but conversely, if we had been in TT's shoes we would be saying "we should have won by 20" and you know they are probably saying the same thing. Clemson is probably saying that they should have won, and we are saying we should have beaten them by a lot. It doesn't make sense to me to reference the TT game when talking about playing Virginia Tech next year.
VT will be more talented at some positions, but not at others and at home they will be ready. I bet this game will be just as close as last year's game, but it will be lower scoring, played more ACC style than high flying BIG 12 style.