Suntrup, there has been some question on how he fits in with the new style of offense that we seem to be headed toward.
Question by whom? Fans?
Even if we're moving towards a different offense - more power based or whatever - it doesn't mean we're going to take athletes and stick them at QB and hope they can throw. Sure, maybe we don't want statues that hang back in the shotgun and sling it all day, but that's not Suntrup. His film, albeit by my non-expert eyes, is just certifiably nuts. He's under center a lot, always moving around in the pocket and rolling out, buying time, then making BEAUTIFUL throws. He's not a guy that just knows how to lob or just zips every throw - he knows how to get the ball to his guy in all sorts of circumstances. Probably my favorite recruit in the '11 class right now.
I don't get the "we're moving to a different offense" thing sometimes. First it was "we're scrapping WCO, and going spread." Then it's "screw the pansy spread deal, we're going old school power." It seems to me like we simply have a coaching staff willing to adapt year-in, year-out, and to mold the scheme around the players? I mean, whatever offense we run, it won't be 90's Nebraska. We still have this position called "quarterback." I don't understand at all the bias against some guys just because they know how to throw the ball. Do we
want bad passers? It's not like Suntrup, Gabbert, etc are slow and immobile.
I don't mean to come off inflammatory with this post, it's just I've seen the "yea, but we don't want those kind of guys at QB anymore with the offense we're heading towards" too much and I've just never understood it. It seems our requirements these days for judging QB prospects include "poor throwing ability" (but good HS stats). Frustrating!