tschu
Banned
My point is that even in his A game, not every shot will be perfect. He still misses a ton of shots, even when playing at his best. Go back and watch his 2000 season, he didn't stripe every drive and stick every approach. Hell, he had a triple bogey at the US Open at Pebble that he won by 15 strokes. To nitpick over 5 approaches that you perceive as bad (only 2 of them were remotely bad) is silly, it's like complaining that he didn't make every 15-foot putt, or complaining that Kobe went 3-for-4 from downtown instead of 4-for-4. Golf is a game with a huge amount of variance. (I think we're mostly in agreement; I'm just nitpicking because trying to find imperfection in an imperfect game seems silly to me). A common thing people think about old Tiger is that his tee-to-green game was out of this world. It was good, but where he really won all those tournaments was on the putting green.
With that said, statistics seem to indicate we have the old Tiger back. Now I hate most golf statistics, especially early in the year when most players only have a few data points, and those data points are highly inconsistent due to both the nature of the game and the fact that everyone plays different tournaments.
But Tiger is
1 in strokes gained putting (by a large margin)
2 in distance to pin on approaches over 100 yards
21 in scrambling
51 in total driving
those are just classic Tiger stats, haha
With that said, statistics seem to indicate we have the old Tiger back. Now I hate most golf statistics, especially early in the year when most players only have a few data points, and those data points are highly inconsistent due to both the nature of the game and the fact that everyone plays different tournaments.
But Tiger is
1 in strokes gained putting (by a large margin)
2 in distance to pin on approaches over 100 yards
21 in scrambling
51 in total driving
those are just classic Tiger stats, haha
Last edited by a moderator: