2018 Blackshirts vs. 2017 Blackshirts

Doesn't account for relative strength of offenses faced or pace of play.

Last year the offenses we played averaged 5.37 yards per play for the year, which is roughly the same as the #70 offense in the country.  This year the offenses we've faced are averaging 5.70 yards per play which is about #48.  Also, last year we faced 69.7 plays per game.  This year we are seeing 76.9 plays per game.  Just that difference is nearly 40 yards per game.  Obviously the defense's ability to get off the field plays a part in that but it's not totally the defense's fault either.

But the best way to compare is looking at yards per play allowed and compare that to what our opponents did against other teams.  Last year our opponents averaged 6.3 yards per play against us which is 0.93 yards per play more than they got against everyone else.  This year they are getting 5.9 yards per play against us - a decrease of 0.4 ypp - but that is only 0.20 yards per play more than they got against other teams which is 0.73 yards per play better than it was last year.  

For comparision, the vaunted 2007 defense allowed 0.47 yards more to our opponents than they got against others.  Last year it was basically twice that.  We've cut that discrepancy by over 80% this year, which seems like a significant improvement.  

Not that it doesn't need to get better.  But I think there's been progress.

Here are the stats for as far back as the site I pulled them from goes. Negative (in parenthesis) is better.

YEAR - YPP - OYPP - DIFF
2003 - 4.3 - 5.15 -(0.85)

2004 - 5.0 - 4.91 - 0.09
2005 - 4.6 - 4.85 -(0.25)
2006 - 5.2 - 5.38 -(0.18)
2007 - 6.0 - 5.53 - 0.47

2008 - 5.4 - 5.41 -(0.01)
2009 - 3.9 - 5.21 -(1.31)
2010 - 4.5 - 5.29 -(0.79)
2011 - 5.2 - 5.51 -(0.31)
2012 - 5.3 - 5.48 -(0.18)
2013 - 4.9 - 5.36 -(0.46)
2014 - 5.2 - 5.53 -(0.33)

2015 - 5.7 - 5.28 - 0.42
2016 - 5.4 - 5.26 - 0.14


2017 - 6.3 - 5.37 - 0.93

2018 - 5.9 - 5.70 - 0.20
I know we talk about it alot, but that 2009 defense was God Tier.

 
One defense gives up 500 yards of offense but only allows 21 points because the other team fumbles twice in the red zone and misses a field goal.

Another defense gives up 200 yards of offense but allows 31 points because their offense turned it over deep in their own territory and the special teams gave up two long kick returns.

Which team has the better defense?
In that highly unlikely scenario the conclusion would be hard to come too.  In your second scenario the defense only gave up 17, if I'm assuming the final score was 31. 

 
No total scoring defense is the best measure because that's how many points they score to beat you.  There is no other "best" measure around the actual fact of the scoring of the other teams offense. 
Easily disproved with an example:

Two teams both gave up 20 points per game. Team A played the 12 best offenses in college football that year. Team B played the 12 worst offenses. It's not even a question which defense was better even though they gave up the same number of points.

 
In that highly unlikely scenario the conclusion would be hard to come too.  In your second scenario the defense only gave up 17, if I'm assuming the final score was 31. 


No, not long kick returns for TDs.  Just long kick returns that gave the offense very good field position.

 
It seems like they are improving but Minny and BC don’t make for good measurement.  Having good games against Iowa and MSU (both currently ranked) would be confirmation.
I don't disagree with you but when you're comparing rankings of the teams, keep in mind that in the early weeks when compared to the other teams, we had played 1 less pansy due to ours getting rescheduled.

 
I took a post I wrote from November 13th of 2017 and added the current percentiles to it in parentheses below:

"Here are the percentile rankings for the Cornhuskers relative to stats from only the conference games played between FBS opponents to date this season:











Pass D stats


 




completions per game


78 (11)




percentage


36 (56)




yards per attempt


71 (42)




touchdowns per game


83 (47)




rating


66 (51)




yards per game


88 (8)




 


 




Pass O stats


 




completions per game


75 (78)




percentage


61 (84)




yards per attempt


59 (64)




touchdowns per game


66 (44)




rating


59 (65)




yards per game


78 (75)




 


 




Rush D stats


 




yards per carry


7 (17)




touchdowns per game


10 (6)




yards per game


11 (27)




 


 




Rush O stats


 




yards per carry


14 (80)




touchdowns per game


9 (77)




yards per game


12 (71)




 


 




Scoring D stats


 




touchdowns per game


17 (12)




points per game


22 (9)




 


 




Scoring O stats


 




touchdowns per game


24 (61)




points per game


24 (57)




 


 




Total D stats


 




yards per play


30 (19)




yards per game


46 (8)




plays per game


75 (15)




 


 




Total O stats


 




yards per play


48 (80)




yards per game


40 (87)




plays per game


34 (70)




 


 




Turnover Margin stats


 




fumbles gained per game


4 (30)




interceptions gained per game


51 (50)




turnovers gained per game


14 (37)




fumbles lost per game


83 (34)




interceptions lost per game


36 (65)




turnovers lost per game


62 (51)




turnover margin per game


30 (41)




 


 




Average % for all these stats


43 (47)"







p.s. - These were the final stats from last season:





Pass D stats


 




completions per game


32




percentage


12




yards per attempt


51




touchdowns per game


50




rating


35




yards per game


56




 


 




Pass O stats


 




completions per game


77




percentage


48




yards per attempt


50




touchdowns per game


69




rating


45




yards per game


78




 


 




Rush D stats


 




yards per carry


6




touchdowns per game


6




yards per game


16




 


 




Rush O stats


 




yards per carry


16




touchdowns per game


20




yards per game


12




 


 




Scoring D stats


 




touchdowns per game


10




points per game


12




 


 




Scoring O stats


 




touchdowns per game


40




points per game


39




 


 




Total D stats


 




yards per play


18




yards per game


27




plays per game


58




 


 




Total O stats


 




yards per play


44




yards per game


42




plays per game


43




 


 




Turnover Margin stats


 




fumbles gained per game


7




interceptions gained per game


37




turnovers gained per game


13




fumbles lost per game


96




interceptions lost per game


5




turnovers lost per game


42




turnover margin per game


19




 


 




Average % for all these stats


35






 
Last edited by a moderator:
Incorrect.  But if you'd have shown your work, you could've gotten partial credit.
Pretty funny there bud.  Unfortunately the team that holds the other team to less points actually wins the football game.  I more the anyone point to statistics as the basis for judgement, points per play is metric used by fan bases to artificially inflate their own opinions of how good a defense is.  Also if the score was 29-28?  Who wins?

 
Pretty funny there bud.  Unfortunately the team that holds the other team to less points actually wins the football game.  I more the anyone point to statistics as the basis for judgement, points per play is metric used by fan bases to artificially inflate their own opinions of how good a defense is.  Also if the score was 29-28?  Who wins?
Thanks bud.  So the ultimate result is all that matters.  There is no other metric that could possibly have value in characterizing performance. Trent Dilfer is a better quarterback than Dan Marino because ... Super Bowls.  Any other statistic or quantitative judgement in between is meaningless because .... scoreboard.

 
Also if the score was 29-28?  Who wins?




This is actually an argument against your point. You keep ignoring the effects of offense and special teams on the game and act as though defense happens in a vacuum.

The only thing that matters is points scored vs. points against in a particular game, and if your offense plays fast your defense is going to face more series by the opposing teams, and will tend toward allowing more points, but that doesn’t mean they are a worse defense than one that allows less points while playing with a plodding offense that scores few points per game. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks bud.  So the ultimate result is all that matters.  There is no other metric that could possibly have value in characterizing performance. Trent Dilfer is a better quarterback than Dan Marino because ... Super Bowls.  Any other statistic or quantitative judgement in between is meaningless because .... scoreboard.




The funny thing is he hasn’t even been talking about the scoreboard until now. He’s only been talking about points against. As if having a fast offense that increases the # of series by 20% (and scores more) automatically means the defense is worse if they allow more points.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top