that is very much how i felt about ucla going into last year. but nebraska generally either competes for most of a game and then gets blown out or is losing most of the game and then snatches victory from the jaws of defeat. or they just blow out a pretty bad team.
Where was that said? If y'all cant see or choose to ignore the changes in both the program and football in general then that speaks about you not the rest of us.
I'm pretty sure we are speaking to the changes specifically to Nebraska football, our displeasure about it, and how it should change.
Right, and other teams have nice weight rooms. It was so much easier when we were the only school who lifted weights and the other teams only had a medicine ball and a book on phrenology for S/C
So, are you saying that we don't have a bunch of inexperienced guys expected to play big roles, or that inexperienced guys should just be better than the guys before them? Kinda like sprinkle some fairy dust on them and "Boom!" they're magically great.
I'm saying that people don't agree with your excuse and you probably should find a new one for why Nebraska underachieved or will next year.
I prefer to make informed decisions, not base my opinions based on my own dillusions or non-truths on a message board.
Our coaches do seem to say "boom" a lot. Maybe you've uncovered their method of player development.
Oh,so you're just throwing crap against the wall. Can't believe it took me this long to come to that conclusion. Continue on....
Basing your conclusions on a sports team by relying on information on the local talk radio show is akin to forming your political opinion by listening to Rush Limbaugh or Keith Olbermann.