I agree with this. IMO, the NFL looks at the measurables first. That is the reason some guys get all the pre-draft hype and some are relegated further down in predictions. They have the chance in the combine to impress as well as in camp, but the initial chatter is always about the guys who "look" the part.Gregory's weight really shouldn't be an issue. Abdullah I can see...there are a lot of backs in the world, after all. Gregory seriously just reminds me of JPP. No 43 team can complain about that and he can be a 34 OLB too.
I don't think this is true. The NFL is very bottom line. Look at Danny Woodhead for example, or undrafted Texas Tech alum receivers Wes Welker and Danny Amendola. There are plenty of guys who don't have the measurables who make it. But there are also plenty of the guys who don't have the measurables who don't. Why spend your prime high picks on those guys, when you can bring in a dozen of the latter category in for workouts or draft them later?NFL is truly stuck on what a position should "look like". Hell they loved Josh Freeman and Gabbert..............
I think AA would do a great job ala Sproles, but scouts have him lower based up his size and probably his fumbles.....