ZRod
Heisman Trophy Winner
We've heard you. Now say something original and new, or kindly bugger off.Yeah a choke artist
Last edited by a moderator:
We've heard you. Now say something original and new, or kindly bugger off.Yeah a choke artist
Agreed- but That play had been money in the past at the goal line. Johnson got tossed around like a rag doll on that play.I didn't mind going for it, but the playcall left a lot to be desired.
Cause it's pretty straightforward, and needs to be discussedWe've heard you. Now say something original and new, or kindly bugger off.
Cause it's pretty straightforward, and needs to be discussed
I’m happy he went for it. NU wasn t going to win by kicking field goals, and that decision had no bearing on the final score anyways as far as winning or losingI'm not upset with the decision. However, when they lined up to run a play, I was really wishing they would kick and put points on the board. If it works, the entire narrative around the decision is different. He was being aggressive and I liked that part.
I believe AM missed the inside cut, ensuring the first dish at a minimum. Instead he went wide.I heard it noted that we seem to be averse to throwing the ball into the end zone.
I'd have to watch it again but I really think it should have been there. We just completely whiffed on the down block from the outside.
I’m happy he went for it. NU wasn t going to win by kicking field goals, and that decision had no bearing on the final score anyways as far as winning or losing
I’m saying if we kick field goal, IM doesn’t go for 2 and miss and we don’t go for 2 and make it. This we are 1 point behind anyways even if the entire game goes the same. Those two plays don’t happen.It's just kind of a mind-bender for me though because with as highly rated as UM's athletes are on defense, if you would have told me coming into this one that we scored 29 on them I would have been thrilled.
We've struggled to put up that much in the vast majority of conference games we've played under Frost, and I can back that up with stats (it's an easy metric to calculate).
So assuming that our second half on offense is equal, having had the chance to get to 32 points - just in and of itself - is pretty damn impressive IMO.
But the thing I'm big on though is reminding people (myself included) that just because we get those 3 points on the first drive doesn't necessarily mean everything that occurred after that is identical to how it wound up playing out. And I think you're saying the same thing in your post as well.
I’m saying if we kick field goal, IM doesn’t go for 2 and miss and we don’t go for 2 and make it. This we are 1 point behind anyways even if the entire game goes the same. Those two plays don’t happen.
I believe AM missed the inside cut, ensuring the first dish at a minimum. Instead he went wide.
But you're not discussing, so move along.Cause it's pretty straightforward, and needs to be discussed
Nor are you. Do you think a sports phycologist would help?But you're not discussing, so move along.
I mean if you got something better say it. I find it more productive to find solutions to problems as oppose to just complaining about the topic. I mean I for one want to start winning these games!But you're not discussing, so move along.
It's been discussed ad nauseam. He knows he f#&%ed up, and takes responsibility. Adrian gives us the best chance of winning even with his turnovers. He's balled out this year and made mistakes, but he's also kept us in every game against top 10 opppnents. Smoother while competent is not ready to take over the team this year and be at Adrian's level. We are ride or die with Adrian this season. End of story.I mean if you got something better say it. I find it more productive to find solutions to problems as oppose to just complaining about the topic. I mean I for one want to start winning these games!