I've considered this, but I also thought he probably put on 25 pounds of muscle... and I would assume he would be stronger and quicker.... possibly it's some injury we never heard about that is still holding him back.My take on Turner is that he was a very quick and explosive freshman at ca. 240 pounds. As a sophomore they had him beef up to 255 or so and his quickness was reduced. Now, at 270, on film he no longer looks quick and is seemingly of average quickness. So, the staff, in making him large have, in effect, taken away the very thing upon which his sucess was based --- an explosive first step.
It could be that he is no longer quick because of an unspecified injury or something. What is certain is that that great explosion off the edge is nowhere to be seen. I would again assert that this is because he is 25 pounds (or more) heavier than when he was explosive.
Even muscle slows you down (or at least most of us). years ago I was a competitive raquetball player, and a lifter. I got to a point where i added 15 pounds of muscle (to a small body -- from 160 -175 pounds). when I did this my racquetball game suffered badly --- both quickness and flexability were really reduced. of course, I was a poor athlete to begin with. But the point is that even adding pure muscle can reduce quickness and flexability. Fat, I am sure would be worse --- but bulk is bulk.
Everytime Turner chases down a QB he does so with a 25 pound sandbag (fat or muscle, matters not) on his back.