RockyMountainOySker
New member
While KU has upgraded their facilities considerably I wouldn't call it a tie. We still have a little edge. Hell Swigert had been to Ohio State and Mich but was still blown away by what we have.Nebraska vs Kansas:
Tradition: Nebraska
Facilities: Nebraska
Championships: Nebraska
Players In The NFL: Nebraska
Coaching Staff: Nebraska
Facilities are not as important as many people think. Also, KU just put a ton of money into their football facilities and they are as good as you can find anywhere. The only thing that still sucks is the stadium itself. KU also has Lawrence. Lawrence is an awesome city.....much better than Lincoln (sorry but it's true). The campus is also much better at KU.
Let's also not forget that our society has the "what have you do for me lately" outlook. So IMO.....
Tradition: N
Facilities: even
Championships: barely matters (these kids don't remember the 90s - - besides this could fall under tradition)
Players in the NFL: N
Coaching Staff: even (remember, what have you done for me lately....Mangino has done plenty)
City: KU
Campus: KU
Also, Lawrence is nice, and it's close to KC, but WAY better than Lincoln? No.
Like I said it's just my opinion. I'm from Omaha and spent over 12 years going to Lincoln for games, golf, etc....and it is a great town but no where near the quality of city as Lawrence. I spent 4 years in Lawrence and 2 years in KC (going back to Lawrence) and I don't think the 2 cities even compare. IMO Austin and Lawrence are by far the best two cities in the Big 12. I personally put Lincoln no better then 5th best - behind Lawrence, Austin, Boulder, and Norman.