HuskerMerc44
New member
T Boone NosePickens wants results, but
He'd be crazy to give up on Gumby.
*Gundy*
Gundy has been great for OSU.
He'd be crazy to give up on Gumby.
*Gundy*
Gundy has been great for OSU.
What's going on with both schools down there? Seems like a dumpster fire all the way around.Rumors here are that, if ASU loses to UofA, that may be the end for Todd Graham in Tempe. After two 10 win seasons, the wheels have completely fallen off, especially for the defense. When you claim to be a defensive genius and have the worst pass defense in the country two years in a row, that doesn't sit well.
UofA has really struggled with injuries and a lack of depth. But, from what I understand, Rich Rod is safe. They are looking at this week's game as their bowl game, because it would keep ASU from getting that 6th win for bowl eligibility.What's going on with both schools down there? Seems like a dumpster fire all the way around.Rumors here are that, if ASU loses to UofA, that may be the end for Todd Graham in Tempe. After two 10 win seasons, the wheels have completely fallen off, especially for the defense. When you claim to be a defensive genius and have the worst pass defense in the country two years in a row, that doesn't sit well.
It's a weird deal definitely. But youre dealing with human beings, with real emotions and real minds. There's so much more to coaching success than just lining up the best and rolling the ball out. There are sooooo many examples and instances that the best player isnt always the best player. There has to be a degree of fit, both schematically and mentally. Bottom line is, it's just hard to win at any program anymore. It just is.I still can't get over how bad of coaches some people must be to not win at some programs. USC. If you can't win there you are terrible. ND, if you can't win there you are terrible. ND gets recruits every year from all over that leave me scratching my head as to why they would commit there because ND hasn't been good since Lou Holtz days. USC barely has to recruit outide of their city let alone outside of their state. Both programs should probably pull a Michigan and find the highest profile alum and higher them
The recruiting sites want you to believe there's a massive difference in the amount of talent at the top 10 programs versus, say, the 20th to 40th program.I still can't get over how bad of coaches some people must be to not win at some programs. USC. If you can't win there you are terrible. ND, if you can't win there you are terrible. ND gets recruits every year from all over that leave me scratching my head as to why they would commit there because ND hasn't been good since Lou Holtz days. USC barely has to recruit outide of their city let alone outside of their state. Both programs should probably pull a Michigan and find the highest profile alum and higher them
So what metrics should be used to identify Top 10 coaching? I know Dave Bartoo has a coaching metric, but I'm not sure how reliable it is.The recruiting sites want you to believe there's a massive difference in the amount of talent at the top 10 programs versus, say, the 20th to 40th program.I still can't get over how bad of coaches some people must be to not win at some programs. USC. If you can't win there you are terrible. ND, if you can't win there you are terrible. ND gets recruits every year from all over that leave me scratching my head as to why they would commit there because ND hasn't been good since Lou Holtz days. USC barely has to recruit outide of their city let alone outside of their state. Both programs should probably pull a Michigan and find the highest profile alum and higher them
There simply isn't. So while talent helps, only average coaching will produce, at best, only slightly above average results. Because a 30th ranked roster can easily beat a 5th ranked roster if the coaching at #30 is great and the coaching at #5 is only average.
What is dangerous is when you have a top 20 roster and top 10 coaching. That's the recipe for a lot of wins.
And of course a top 5 roster with top 10 coaching (e.g., Alabama) is a recipe for dominance .
Where would you rank Pelini's coaching and his rosters?The recruiting sites want you to believe there's a massive difference in the amount of talent at the top 10 programs versus, say, the 20th to 40th program.I still can't get over how bad of coaches some people must be to not win at some programs. USC. If you can't win there you are terrible. ND, if you can't win there you are terrible. ND gets recruits every year from all over that leave me scratching my head as to why they would commit there because ND hasn't been good since Lou Holtz days. USC barely has to recruit outide of their city let alone outside of their state. Both programs should probably pull a Michigan and find the highest profile alum and higher them
There simply isn't. So while talent helps, only average coaching will produce, at best, only slightly above average results. Because a 30th ranked roster can easily beat a 5th ranked roster if the coaching at #30 is great and the coaching at #5 is only average.
What is dangerous is when you have a top 20 roster and top 10 coaching. That's the recipe for a lot of wins.
And of course a top 5 roster with top 10 coaching (e.g., Alabama) is a recipe for dominance .