Avery Moss - updates - 1/9 **readmission denied**

I feel bad for the kid. That is unfortunate.

"Cited Title IX concerns."

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It was nice of them to wait until three days before classes begin.

He sacrificed a year of his life to stay at Nebraska. I hope he is able to enroll somewhere else ASAP and get his career back on track.

 
QMany said:
It was nice of them to wait until three days before classes begin.

He sacrificed a year of his life to stay at Nebraska. I hope he is able to enroll somewhere else ASAP and get his career back on track.
Click to expand...
It sounds like he got tremendously bad advice, I'd take it up with them before you start disparaging an institution you're supposedly like.

 
QMany said:
NUpolo8 said:
It sounds like he got tremendously bad advice, I'd take it up with them before you start disparaging an institution you're supposedly like.
Click to expand...
Who is them you speak of? I wasn't privy to these conversations like you.
Click to expand...
But you are privy to the inner workings of this grand scheme by some shadowy folk at NU to waste a year of Moss's life, as you put it. Interesting.

He's gone. It's probably for the best. All he had to do was not commit sexual assault twice and he stays. I'm chalking this up to an "oh well"

 
Couple things..

Avery was never promised anything by the University in regards to being eligible once again. If Avery was promised anything, it was by certain coaches who thought they could control the situation.

Avery was very aware from the beginning that he was only promised the opportunity for an appeal from the University, never a guaranteed reinstatement.

 
NUpolo8 said:
QMany said:
NUpolo8 said:
All he had to do was not commit sexual assault twice and he stays.
Click to expand...
He didn't commit sexual assault.
Click to expand...
Pleading exposing yourself twice down to indecency then. Semanticsboard lives!

I still don't want him back.
Click to expand...
He didn't need to plead it down. None of his actions were first, second, or third degree sexual assault in Nebraska. It is not semantics, it is the law. You are are improperly applying it and accusing a former Husker player of a crime he didn't commit.

 
What kind of world do we live in where a man is not allowed to whip his dong out in public? SMH

But in all seriousness, I don't know the whole story, and I'm biased because I think he's an exceptionally talented DE which we need next year, but from an outsiders perspective, I don't like how this looks. It stinks.

 
QMany said:
NUpolo8 said:
QMany said:
NUpolo8 said:
All he had to do was not commit sexual assault twice and he stays.
Click to expand...
He didn't commit sexual assault.
Click to expand...
Pleading exposing yourself twice down to indecency then. Semanticsboard lives!

I still don't want him back.
Click to expand...
He didn't need to plead it down. None of his actions were first, second, or third degree sexual assault in Nebraska. It is not semantics, it is the law. You are are improperly applying it and accusing a former Husker player of a crime he didn't commit.
Click to expand...
Maybe he's not guilty of sexual assault, as legally defined in Nebraska. However, in some states flashing would be considered sexual assault.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
QMany said:
NUpolo8 said:
QMany said:
NUpolo8 said:
All he had to do was not commit sexual assault twice and he stays.
Click to expand...
He didn't commit sexual assault.
Click to expand...
Pleading exposing yourself twice down to indecency then. Semanticsboard lives!

I still don't want him back.
Click to expand...
He didn't need to plead it down. None of his actions were first, second, or third degree sexual assault in Nebraska. It is not semantics, it is the law. You are are improperly applying it and accusing a former Husker player of a crime he didn't commit.
Click to expand...
a lot of the law is a matter of semantics. what do you think is being argued in so many appellate cases?

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top