B1G Reverting to Eight Conference Games per Year?

Red Five said:
Here is an example 3 permanent games with 14.  In this example, Wisc and Iowa have the same 3 opponents, but Nebraska and Minnesota have a different 4th opponent.



You could keep the 4 western together, 4 central together, then have the other 6 each have different permanent games between them.
Click to expand...
Looking over this chart, anything with Rutgers or Maryland as permanent games sucks. Everything else looks good.  :thumbs

 
I would rather keep it 9 but alter the times 

Week 1&2 OOC

WEEKS 3-7 4 big ten games 1 bye

WEEK 8 OOC

WEEK 9-14 5 big ten games 1 bye

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Indiana, Purdue, Northwestern & Rutgers's permanent games in this scenario... It'd be like the Legends and Leaders again.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'd rather play 8 conference games with no division and with two permanent protected rivals every year.  Iowa and another team depending on other protected rivals for Nebraska to go along with 1 ACC and 1 Pac-12 game.  Two other games, a G5 and FCS tuneup.  Michigan wouldn't be an option as they would have Ohio State and Michigan State as their protected rivals as an example.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
DrinkinwitTerrellFarley said:
I'd rather play 8 conference games with no division and with two permanent protected rivals every year.  Iowa and another team depending on other protected rivals for Nebraska to go along with 1 ACC and 1 Pac-12 game.  Two other games, a G5 and FCS tuneup.  Michigan wouldn't be an option as they would have Ohio State and Michigan State as their protected rivals as an example.
Click to expand...
That's still 10 P5 games and the SEC still has an advantage.  Going to 8 conference games means you should go down to 9 P5 games max, or what's the point?

 
Red Five said:
Here is an example 3 permanent games with 14.  In this example, Wisc and Iowa have the same 3 opponents, but Nebraska and Minnesota have a different 4th opponent.



You could keep the 4 western together, 4 central together, then have the other 6 each have different permanent games between them.
Click to expand...
Seems some teams have it much easier. Northwestern, Purdue, Rutgers and Indiana to speak of. 

 
84HuskerLaw said:
Very good but really Trev should just forget fixing the stadium and just go all Road Warriors!  No more issues with drunken fans. Cleaning up those beer cans, poopsi cups, pizza pie boxes, balloons polluting the Atlantic, traffic jams around Lincoln, wear and tear in roads, gas wasted, etc etc.  

If we can’t kick Bama and Buckeye a$$ on the road every week-end, we don’t deserve to even have a football team.  After all, Neb fans are spoiled brats that stupidly think things ought be fair!    Enough crybaby stuff.  
Click to expand...
The Nebraska Nomads! I like it! 

 
I hadn't seen this before.  This actually makes pretty good sense.


FMIUbWYWQAEsRKO


 
I like it although I seriously doubt Texas Tech wants a yearly match up with Texas lol.  Not after bailing the conference.  I also thought Oklahoma State was very ticked off at OU for leaving, so they might even reduce the series with them to every few years.  Who knows for sure right now, but it sure is interesting.

As for Missouri having to play OU & Texas, that would suck for them.  Thought the positive side of leaving Big 12 conference is not having to deal with those guys. :dunno

 
Texas Tech has a much better chance of playing an annual game against a Mountain West opponent, lol.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top