cornographic
Banned
Ah, next they'll make it illegal to hit guys too low--knees doncha know. Knee injuries have > since they took away the head shots.
Well if you go back too far, like the early 20th Century, you had 100 players a year getting killed playing college football.Which goes back to the conversations people have about taking helmets out of football (or going back to the leather ones) to help reinforce fundamentals (via 'pain management').Not having a helmet or pads is good motivation for clean hits.I was just talking to our HC, and we just kind of shrugged our shoulders and said....well it's nothing different from what we teach. It's the athletes willingness to get low to make the tackle that is the difference.
I've always thought hitting high was super lazy.
Yeah. I think Roosevelt actually tried to ban it didn't he. The whole leather helmet argument conveniently ignores the existence and evolution of the forward pass which you don't have in Rugby. Those plays at speed and in space where one player may twist or duck awkwardly at the last moment would ultimately result in catastrophic head injuries in today's game if helmets were removedWell if you go back too far, like the early 20th Century, you had 100 players a year getting killed playing college football.Which goes back to the conversations people have about taking helmets out of football (or going back to the leather ones) to help reinforce fundamentals (via 'pain management').Not having a helmet or pads is good motivation for clean hits.I was just talking to our HC, and we just kind of shrugged our shoulders and said....well it's nothing different from what we teach. It's the athletes willingness to get low to make the tackle that is the difference.
I've always thought hitting high was super lazy.
Yep!This is the common type of tackling that most teach, as far as "strike zone" and wrap and drive for five. I will say that among high school athletes, the "side tackling" will take time to teach. Hopefully, the D1 athlete can learn a new technique better than we did. Our linebacker coach went to this style this past season. If you notice, the side tackle has the defender putting his head "behind" the runner and sitting back, thus not running the risk of the runner landing on the defenders head. In theory, it is a great idea, plus the defenders momentum will hopefully "drag" the runner backwards, not resulting in as many yards after contact. What I noticed very early in the season, our kids were placing their head behind runner and trying to drive/sit/pull, but it was beginning to look like we were leaving our feet and becoming arm tacklers. Yes, we were teaching it correctly, but obviously could have done a much better job of teaching, but midway through the first game, I had seen enough of the opposing runners running through our tackles, I called a TO and told them NO MORE of the new crap, square their butt up and drive through. Furthermore, get your head on the upfield side and club, wrap and drive. Things changed dramatically. I am sure this is the proper way to do it, but we just didn't do a good job of teaching it. Plus, it will take time to perfect, and I wasn't willing to give away a game while we learned.
I'm skeptical of how you were taught. The goal of tackling is to stop the legs from moving...if you can go to the source of what propels how someone physically moves, why wouldn't you do that?i am not so sure this makes a lot of sense, rugby is very different than football, hitting the runner in his upper body and wrapping up is the way the game is taught.......upper body hits are made to wear down the runner and deliver body blows that tire him out......leg tackling is not going to be the best option for getting a guy down in all cases....