The conference champion thing is a big kicker for me. It just doesnt seem right. No common sense. This year. Alabama. Wasnt the best team in their conference. Not even the best in their division. But now theyre the best in the country because some computers and biased voters said they deserved a chance. This system is great when there's only two unanimous undefeated champs of major conferences (only in what 99, 02, 05, and '10?) Otherwise there has always been controversey. It's a national championship. It should be played out on the field. Then there's the argument that there's rematches in the NFL, and division champions dont always win the Super Bowl, but all division champions also have the opportunity to do so. Take the 6 champions from our so called 6 big conferences, throw in the best 2 remaining teams, whether theyre AQ teams or not, and play out a nice 8 team, 3 week gig. Then there's the argument of why should a West Virginia or Clemson get a shot over say a Arkansas or Alabama in this year's case. Well, if your'e good enough, your gonna win your conference or get the wild card anyway. If they want to keep the importance of the regular season, they need to base this thing of off conference champions, and regulate non conference scheduling. It's just a mess, but no matter what is done, half will be unhappy.