Archy1221
Well-known member
No, getting rid of Assad is good all on its own. That is, unless you are a fan of leaders gassing their own people. And, you must also be a fan of Putin invading other nations.
interesting.

No, getting rid of Assad is good all on its own. That is, unless you are a fan of leaders gassing their own people. And, you must also be a fan of Putin invading other nations.
interesting.
I know. It must suck rooting for Putin and seeing his country fall apart without American boots on the ground. Our new director of intelligence is having a really bad time right now. She will fix it when she gets in though.
:laughpoundI know. It must suck rooting for Putin and seeing his country fall apart without American boots on the ground. Our new director of intelligence is having a really bad time right now. She will fix it when she gets in though.
No, getting rid of Assad is good all on its own. That is, unless you are a fan of leaders gassing their own people. And, you must also be a fan of Putin invading other nations.
interesting.
Yes, then you get rid of him till you get someone good. I’m not into supporting horrible evil leaders.Is getting rid of Hitler good if the person who gets rid of him and assumes his power is Ultra Robo Evil Hitler 2.0?
Yes, then you get rid of him till you get someone good. I’m not into supporting horrible evil leaders.
Nope, but claiming Biden’s foreign police is a complete failure because Assad is gone….even though American military didn’t do it directly and didn’t lose one life….is close to it.Is saying "we'll see if this turns out good or not because we don't know what will happen next" the same thing as supporting someone?
Yet no one is claiming what you just posted.Nope, but claiming Biden’s foreign police is a complete failure because Assad is gone….even though American military didn’t do it directly and didn’t lose one life….is close to it.
Then it must be that you’re upset that Biden put together a coalition of countries to help Ukraine fight Putin and turn Russia into a disaster?Yet no one is claiming what you just posted.
It’s interesting that 2 of 3 recent Presidents were in charge when Russia invaded Ukraine. It must be you are upset about it.Then it must be that you’re upset that Biden put together a coalition of countries to help Ukraine fight Putin and turn Russia into a disaster?
I'm not upset about how Biden has handled it. I'm not the one claiming this thread needs locked up with the title changed.It’s interesting that 2 of 3 recent Presidents were in charge when Russia invaded Ukraine. It must be you are upset about it.
And, obviously, you think Putin didn't invade because he's so scared of Trump.....It’s interesting that 2 of 3 recent Presidents were in charge when Russia invaded Ukraine. It must be you are upset about it.
But you are the one gnashing your teeth trying to equate one foreign conflict into Biden’s entire foreign policy. No one else is.I'm not upset about how Biden has handled it. I'm not the one claiming this thread needs locked up with the title changed.
No need to continue gnashing teeth. I just pointed out a factual statement.And, obviously, you think Putin didn't invade because he's so scared of Trump.....
https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/02/world/china-russia-ukraine-invasion-olympics-western-intel/index.html
Funny how the Olympics ended February 20th and Russia invaded February 24th.
No nashing at all.But you are the one gnashing your teeth trying to equate one foreign conflict into Biden’s entire foreign policy. No one else is.
His foreign policy has been terrible as it has been for decades. He is kinda just President INO now (I guess that’s been the case for awhile) so yeah, my post fits.![]()