I've heard that 150 is the target number. We'll be adding a few more this year but probably lose a few as well. But I would guess that the 2020 season will see that 150 number.
I'm hearing that we shouldn't be surprised if an announcement is made this summer with plans to have a new facility in place two years after that. Main issue is cleaning up some behind-the-scenes stuff - mainly making sure all the bases are covered to be sensitive to budget cuts the rest of the University is looking at even though the athletic department is printing money.
Is 160 the eventual goal? Thought I read that somewhere.
I thought I've seen 150 a few times. But I could be wrong.
I think Frost understands this. Roster size doesn't mean jack squat if you aren't developing every guy on the roster. On the other hand, it can be a huge advantage to have a larger than most roster if you are getting the most out of each guy.Unless they are serious about having enough stations operating practice for almost all these guys actually getting reps and practicing, I think getting 150+ players with half of them being walk-ons is a waste of resources.
Now, if they can organize and manage practice in a manner that all to those players are getting reps and having a chance to get better and prove what they can do, then great......
That isnt enough depth. I want to be 20 deep at every position.I thought I've seen 150 a few times. But I could be wrong.
That isnt enough depth. I want to be 20 deep at every position.
Roby could play Tight End.You're wasting your time. I already proposed the idea on here to cut every other men's program in the athletic department, and have a roster of 800.... It wasn't met with as much fanfare as I expected. :dunno :lol:![]()
I tried to embrace Bubbles one time but the bouncer said to stop or he would toss me out.
I can guarantee my daughter would lose her effing mind if they had a bubble machine going.Balloons are so 20th century, man. It's time embrace the future of stadium bubbles!
View attachment 14313