Saunders
Heisman Trophy Winner
UMADBRO??? Because it's quite obvious you can't grasp the point that I've made. And just because you can't comprehend the data and argument does not invalidate it. Is my data perfect? No. But it's far better than your bullsh#t opinion that's based on..... nothing.Yea and the fact that ESPN shows some of the games we win 3x per year makes the sentiment that ESPN doesn't show games because we play well bullsh#t. 3:1! Except for the fact that they show the same game we win multiple times a year (by your own admission) means that, your theory is bullsh#t. But please, I was just tryng to save you from wallowing in a sea of your own malcontent. By all means, keep drowning.
Revisionist history, hah. My bad for trying to stop you from believing what you want to.
By the way, I have a recording of the '98 orange bowl vs Tennessee from last year. Could you get your godly DVR to remind me which channel it was on? Knowning you, you'll probably disappear. "I missed one, big deal," that's what I said, oh great reviser of history.
This is laughable. It invalidates NOTHING. I suggest you re-read (if you can) my previous argument. I can't believe I'm having to explain gradeschool logic. Unless ESPN shows each win 3 times for every loss (to counteract the 3:1 Loss-Win ratio), then they're showing more losses than wins. Since it's quite obvious that they don't do this (and others on this board agree), they still show more losses (including blowout losses) than wins. Couple those with the fact that quite a few of those losses are blowouts, and it leads credence to the thought that ESPN shows more (and worse) losses than wins. And once again, you can't find me a blowout win (by intentionally ignoring it), further proving my point.Except for the fact that they show the same game we win multiple times a year (by your own admission) means that, your theory is bullsh#t."
Oh, and just because they show a win multiple times doesn't invalidate the entire argument. They showed the 1984 OB at least 20 times last year.
Also, my "Godly DVR" did a hell of a lot better than you did. I simply listed off the recordings from last year. You harp on me for missing one game, yet you missed over a dozen in your "myth" argument. Hypocrite much?
Oh, and FYI, that '98 OB wasn't on ESPN Classic. Why? For the same reason that the '95 isn't. CBS still owns the rights. :facepalm:
Don't start throwing out more strawmen, it just makes you look silly. I'm not the one "believing what I want to." My stance is based on data and facts, not on a schoolyard "nuh-uh."
Last edited by a moderator: