Big Ten-Pac 12 Pact Dissolves

WoodyHayes1951 said:
huKSer said:
WoodyHayes1951 said:
Muck said:
WoodyHayes1951 said:
I'm ok with this.

I think we would be suffering from over-saturation if teams played in the reg season and played in the postseason.

I'd also rather be playing the SEC,Big XII or ACC.
I think the saturation argument is a bit overblown.

The B1G has a single postseason tie in with the Pac-12 (the Rose Bowl duh). It has 3 with the SEC (Capitol One, Outback & Gator) & 2 with the Big 12 (Insight & Meineke).

The problem with meeting SEC opponents more during the regular season is that so few of it's teams are willing to travel outside of Dixie. As for the Big 12 outside of Texas & Okie there is nobody worth playing.



ACC then.

Weaker conference, good cities, great recruiting states, a bunch of Big Ten alumni in those areas. We also have the BBall set up with them.

And we don't play them in the postseason often if at all.
Wouldn't MAC be a step up over ACC?


You would be correct. But I want it for selfish reasons(ie traveling)

MAC teams retread over the wonderful midwest that I already live in and visit during the Big Ten season.
MAC covers Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, New York and Massachewsets Massechusets Massachushets the state north of Connectthedots, oh heck, Red Sox country

Nope, no Nebraska or Iowa, sounds like good recruiting territory though

 
Yeah, this probably would've been a bigger deal for non-revenue sports than football...it's too bad that it didn't work out.

I think a similar setup with ACC would be fun, but the B1G may be giving up too much leverage by treating the ACC as an equal partner

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So which three schools jacked the deal up?
espn link says 4 schools.

S and A are very common letters. Odds are that said schools have both letters in their names.
Washington

Washington State

Oregon

Oregon State

Arizona

Arizona State

Utah

Utah State (Ok Colorado)

University of Southern California

University of Los Angeles

California

Stanford

That's 7

My guess is USC, UCLA, Oregon, and Stanford

Edit: and Texas

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So which three schools jacked the deal up?
espn link says 4 schools.

S and A are very common letters. Odds are that said schools have both letters in their names.
Washington

Washington State

Oregon

Oregon State

Arizona

Arizona State

Utah

Utah State (Ok Colorado)

University of Southern California

University of Los Angeles

California

Stanford

That's 7

My guess is USC, UCLA, Oregon, and Stanford

Edit: and Texas
Ladies and Gentlemen, we have a winner. :hookerhorns

 
So which three schools jacked the deal up?
espn link says 4 schools.

S and A are very common letters. Odds are that said schools have both letters in their names.
Washington

Washington State

Oregon

Oregon State

Arizona

Arizona State

Utah

Utah State (Ok Colorado)

University of Southern California

University of Los Angeles

California

Stanford

That's 7

My guess is USC, UCLA, Oregon, and Stanford

Edit: and Texas
Ladies and Gentlemen, we have a winner. :hookerhorns
Decky - I love you man.

Just not in a Brokeback mountain way, though.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So which three schools jacked the deal up?
espn link says 4 schools.

S and A are very common letters. Odds are that said schools have both letters in their names.
Washington

Washington State

Oregon

Oregon State

Arizona

Arizona State

Utah

Utah State (Ok Colorado)

University of Southern California

University of Los Angeles

California

Stanford

That's 7

My guess is USC, UCLA, Oregon, and Stanford

Edit: and Texas
I'll have you know I spilled beer all over myself.

 
I have it on good authority that Ty Willingham villain behind in all of this.

It was posted in the comments section under articles and on message boards so it has to be true.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
481545.jpg


meh. Who needs the Pac-12? Let them have each other. :lol:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top