Black Widow Movie

Mavric

Mavric

Yoda
Staff member
D_-J5rBWwAAYHdI


D_-J6YXWkAY0sNl


 
Last edited by a moderator:
Folks were asking for this years ago. Now they kill off the character then give her a movie?

tenor.gif


 
Last edited by a moderator:
Danimal said:
Folks were asking for this years ago. Now they kill off the character then give her a movie?

tenor.gif
Click to expand...


It takes place inbetween Civil War and Infinity War. I doubt there will be a sequel, but if there are, there's plenty of territory with the character to be mined in the past. 

 
Cdog923 said:
It takes place inbetween Civil War and Infinity War. I doubt there will be a sequel, but if there are, there's plenty of territory with the character to be mined in the past. 
Click to expand...


Yes it's set in the past, but it's still stupid to kill-off a character you introduced way back in Iron Man 2 THEN make a movie about her.

 
Danimal said:
Yes it's set in the past, but it's still stupid to kill-off a character you introduced way back in Iron Man 2 THEN make a movie about her.
Click to expand...
Ehh... I see what you're saying, but I don't necessarily think it's "stupid" or off-limits to go this direction.

Star Wars: The Force Awakens killed a central character and then Disney made a standalone movie about that character three years later. It ended up working out OK for the most part.

My bigger concern is that, personally, I don't care much about certain aspects of the Marvel universe anymore. Endgame was incredibly final and climactic. I just don't have any personal interest in diving back down the pre-Endgame rabbit hole with a character like this.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Danimal said:
Yes it's set in the past, but it's still stupid to kill-off a character you introduced way back in Iron Man 2 THEN make a movie about her.
Click to expand...


On one hand, sure; ScarJo should have had her own movie by now within the MCU. However, it's not stupid to give a character their own standalone even after that character is dead; Obi Wan Kenobi has been dead for 30 years, and he's getting one in a couple of years (and I'd be willing to bet that Disney will do the same thing with Luke Skywalker in a few years, hopefully with Sebastian Stan in the role). 

 
Enhance said:
Ehh... I see what you're saying, but I don't necessarily think it's "stupid" or off-limits to go this direction.

Star Wars: The Force Awakens killed a central character and then Disney made a standalone movie about that character three years later. It ended up working out OK for the most part.

My bigger concern is that, personally, I just don't care much about certain aspects of the Marvel universe anymore. Endgame was incredibly final and climatic in a number of ways. I just don't have any personal interest in diving back down the pre-Endgame rabbit hole with a character like this.
Click to expand...


I'd be willing to bet I'm the biggest Marvel nerd on HB, and I'm kind of in the same boat. 

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top