Really, far more concerning than whether Bo wants to go to Miami (doubtful) is just the fact that this media game is being played.
I asked this on page 1, but I actually found the OWH rebuttal article a little bothersome after the initial reassurance. Namely, it says "Pelini said he didn't seek permission from anyone." And it also says "Pelini declined to comment." If you ask me, the first quote there is a comment, and one that diffuses the situation at that. Since Bo was only quoted on the latter, I'm inclined to think the article author extrapolated a little. Or something is weird here.
Even the fact that he refused comment. How hard is it, honestly, to say "no", if there's nothing to it? It's like he WANTS this game to play out in the media.
And Osborne, too. He could have said "No, there's nothing to this." He could have said something that didn't involved "If Bo got permission, it wasn't from me." Now maybe that was some lighthearted tongue-in-cheek, but it doesn't sound good and anyone media savvy would avoid stuff like that. It really gives a pretty strong impression that these two are not on the same page. And it's not about the truth here, internally, because that sort of impression is all that is needed for a situation like this to be damaging.
I don't think Bo will leave, but this is just :facepalm: ugly. No reason this situation had to come up at all, and no reason that once it did, it couldn't be diffused by the University and by Bo. So far, it still hasn't, for whatever reason. That ESPN segment, did it ever come on? You'd think someone could clue them into one of our own articles, but at this point I really think nothing beyond Bo releasing a statement saying it's rubbish, will do any good. An article that quotes Bo as saying no comment, even if it correctly debunks a myth, isn't enough.