Pretty much where I'm at.I think a 3-4 can be a good look. I just don't know if we have the guys to run it right now. Be interesting to see how it works this year.
Apparently McKewon thinks our personnel fits better in the 3-4. Well see I guess.I think a 3-4 can be a good look. I just don't know if we have the guys to run it right now. Be interesting to see how it works this year.
First, is it in McKewon's contract that he has to work Pelini into every article? If so, how long does that run?Apparently McKewon thinks our personnel fits better in the 3-4. Well see I guess.I think a 3-4 can be a good look. I just don't know if we have the guys to run it right now. Be interesting to see how it works this year.
http://www.omaha.com/huskers/blogs/mckewon-five-quick-takes-on-nebraska-hiring-bob-diaco-as/article_7c5ac760-d9e9-11e6-bba1-87606de26190.html
"Banker's replacemtent coming soon after that." The "that" can't be hiring Banker's replacement because it can't come after itself. So the "change" is something other than hiring Banker's replacement. And that leaves......Lest fans think Nebraska had fallen into chaos for however many days, there was a plan, and at least two families of recruits knew the change was happening and Banker’s replacement was coming soon after that.
Yeah, Stolt might actually make a better 34 DE. He'd have to drop some weight and work on agility. But remember he came in two years ago at 250 lbs. and played DE/TE in high school. He might make a great 34 DE. But since he's bulked up to nearly 300 now, and we're so thin at DT (NT), I'm not sure they'd try to move him to DE.I too like the idea of 3-4. I like Stoltenberg's motor but I think he's a little too lanky for NT. Maliek Collins and Kevin Maurice would have been great "Beta" nose tackles. At the same time, we now need two DE's that have to become hybrids (Edge rushes/Interior lineman). Will be interesting to see it all unfold this spring and fall.
Makes sense with the bend don't break comments. What about bringing pressure in the 3-4?I'm no expert on the 3-4, or Diaco's D specifically, but I think it will actually mean more of those short passes, which is fine if the rest of the D is executing the way it should.by "no crease" does that no more of those effin short middle slant passes?
From what I understand of Diaco's D, the secondary plays fairly deep to prevent giving up big plays. Doing that opens up the middle a little more than what you would want, but if it prevent opponents from taking the top off our D, and keeps them out of the end-zone, then God bless it.
Makes sense with the bend don't break comments. What about bringing pressure in the 3-4?I'm no expert on the 3-4, or Diaco's D specifically, but I think it will actually mean more of those short passes, which is fine if the rest of the D is executing the way it should.by "no crease" does that no more of those effin short middle slant passes?
From what I understand of Diaco's D, the secondary plays fairly deep to prevent giving up big plays. Doing that opens up the middle a little more than what you would want, but if it prevent opponents from taking the top off our D, and keeps them out of the end-zone, then God bless it.
According to his bio on the uconn website over his four years at Notre Dame they allowed 19.08 points per game, which is pretty impressive. Also the year he was at Cincinnati should not be overlooked as they ranked 3rd in the nation in TFL per game game (8.46 per game) and 10th in sacks per game (2.85 per game)... He's a players coach and chose us over others, I think he's a great get