He is right. The guy that coached Bowman also coached Murillo.ya you might be right.....one of those JucosI believe that was the guy who coached Bowman and Murillo...I don't know though.I might have read something different than you but I read that the guy who coached both andre jones and bowman said that Jones was farther along coming out of Juco but Bowman had better potential him running a 4.3 and being 6' 2" and all like I said maybe we read something different and I could be wrong tooAs for Bowman––I'd feel safer with him. But I actually read somewhere that the same guy coached Murillo and Bowman, and that coach said Murillo is better. Don't quote me on that, but I'm pretty dang sure that's what I read.![]()
That is true. At least... I hope to God it's true. Otherwise, may He help us all.One thing is for sure..................our secondary is NOT going to be worse this year than it was last year. If anything it's going to be better.
Who said Bowman was the best player in our backfield.....he just plays the same position as the worst player in our backfield!(Grixby) You dont give nearly enough credit to what Green and Asante can do.the best player in our defensive backfield has 2 bad knees and 1 career int.Not to mention Tierre Green who will be playing the same position two years in a row for the first time in his career! Our back seven can rival anyone in the country!
not really awe-inspiring.
:yeahThis all plays into the fact tat we NEED adequate dbs to be able to blitz the lbs.
:yeahIt better be true or my wife is not going to like this football season!!!! I was dropping the f-bomb and yelling at the secondary most of the season!!!! :angry:
Resoundingly YES! Again, its not that Bowman is the best we've got (injury prone), its that Grixby is the worst we have got. (As far as potential starters anyway)Also do you think Grixby would have been replaced as a starter by the USC game last year if Bowman was not injured? I don't.
I still contend Jones was a worse cover corner than Grixby. Especially when you consider that Grixby (not Jones) was matched against the other team's best WR. Let's face it, the entire D sucked against the pass last year.Resoundingly YES! Again, its not that Bowman is the best we've got (injury prone), its that Grixby is the worst we have got. (As far as potential starters anyway)Also do you think Grixby would have been replaced as a starter by the USC game last year if Bowman was not injured? I don't.
Yeah if you would have read my initial post, the question was would Grixby have been replaced by the USC game by Jones if Bowman wasn't injured...I still contend Jones was a worse cover corner than Grixby. Especially when you consider that Grixby (not Jones) was matched against the other team's best WR. Let's face it, the entire D sucked against the pass last year.Resoundingly YES! Again, its not that Bowman is the best we've got (injury prone), its that Grixby is the worst we have got. (As far as potential starters anyway)Also do you think Grixby would have been replaced as a starter by the USC game last year if Bowman was not injured? I don't.
As to whether Grixby would have been starting by the USC game, remember that Jones replaced Bowman and that Grix was always the starter.
OK, well then why wasn't the name of this thread "Grixby is the worst we have got," instead of "Bowman=W's?"Resoundingly YES! Again, its not that Bowman is the best we've got (injury prone), its that Grixby is the worst we have got. (As far as potential starters anyway)Also do you think Grixby would have been replaced as a starter by the USC game last year if Bowman was not injured? I don't.