It's crazy to me the amount of propaganda being pushed out of the campus and media these days. I am fully supportive of Scott Frost, but at what point does he receive any criticism for starting 0-3? He has made numerous coaching errors to get us here see points below (reiteration of previous posts)
-We are losing the turnover margin, and both Martinez and many of the running backs continue to run with the ball away from their body (this comes down to coaching).
-Several 4th and short play-calls, have failed because for some reason Scott Frost refuses to run the most efficient short yardage play: the QB sneak under center.
-His clock management has been very questionable, when we were behind late to Troy he bleeds the clock with plays for an almost 7 minute drive, but when we are ahead against Colorado we can barely run off a minute at all.
-Michigan was certainly more talented than us, but not 56-10 worthy. Frost had a very poor gameplan, and as other posters have pointed out, he lacks a significant power run game.
-The unnecessary penalties continue to plague us, and they need to coach up special teams.
I am so sick of hearing about players who are a "cancer" and not "buying in". Not "buying in" does not cause you to fumble the ball, hold the ball away from your body (or are you going to argue that Adrian Martinez, and about 90% of our running backs aren't "buying in"). It doesn't cause you to commit penalties over and over and over (this is coaching!). It doesn't cause poor clock management. It doesn't cause you to continue running a scheme that the players either are not capable of running, or are not consistently running. For example, has Scott called one offensive play under center yet this year? I'm not saying change your scheme, but why not try something just to change it up.
Still 100% support Scott Frost, but it is becoming increasingly clear that he might have been over hyped. He needs to do some learning and fixing as much (if not more) than the players.
