Hence the "acceptable."We will agree to disagree on the program being an acceptable place. And if Bo decided that he didn't have to communicate to be a head coach.....well we'll file that under other egregious mistakes he made starting his tenure.
He is capable of relaxed, candid, communicative press conferences:
Has anyone ever said that when it's something good, the program did it, not Bo? ... it should be fairly straightforward. Everything Bo does, he does as a representative of NU. He can contribute to NU's prestige (though never so much that his successor won't have to work equally as hard to keep up), and he can tarnish it (though never so much that the school could never recover from).So when it's something good, the program is bigger than Bo. But when it comes to losing, it's Bo that doesn't win?You are of course correct that a few successes will put some cold water on Bo's hot seat, much like how people don't get in an uproar over the other hothead coaches who I'm tired of naming. The problem, and the question at hand, is if Bo is capable of putting some of those personality glitches on ice, as they are one of the reasons why he doesn't win.
He is capable of relaxed, candid, communicative press conferences:
(Guy doesn't like how many posts a thread has)10 pages...
![]()
(Guy doesn't like how many posts a thread has)
(Posts in thread, makes it longer)
Oh c'mon Stone Cold sucked.(Guy doesn't like how many posts a thread has)
(Posts in thread, makes it longer)![]()
Oh c'mon Stone Cold sucked.(Guy doesn't like how many posts a thread has)
(Posts in thread, makes it longer)![]()
I think it's ridiculous for someone to get into this profession and have a difficult time, or, a dislike for talking with the media. It comes with the job and that's pretty well obvious. Someone made the comment that Pelini probably would've been a much happier coach if he'd been an HC 50 years ago. That's probably true. Hell, even 20 years ago.Who do you think he means by we when he says "we didn't execute"?
It could mean just the players, or it could mean the whole team. I think he knows that maybe he could've put his players in a better position at some points during games we lose. There's something of an issue with consistency in how he says things. I wonder how he talks to the players post game and I wonder if he puts the blame more on himself than he does when talking to the media.
It certainly could, it sounds we agree that he needs some help with communication.
But the guy has been head coach for six years, and coaching for 20 under some pretty damn good coaches. I would have hoped he would have learned something on how to talk to the media from Carroll, Stoops, Miles, etc.....