I've said it before, I'll say it again, and I will keep saying it until I am red in the face:
Nebraska needs to stop worrying about 'out-recruiting' other schools who really don't need to work as hard at it as we would.
It is a fool's game (for us). It is a game Nebraska will never win and shouldn't worry about winning.
We need to dump this silly generic copycat impersonation shtick, and as fast as possible.
I am not saying we shouldn't recruit at all, we need to recruit, but not in the same way most everyone else does.
We should be recruiting to supplement and augment the talent available to us, what we HAVE.
Nebraska has ignored what IT HAS for far, far too long.
We should be deriving our identity as a team from what we have available to us, and add the pieces we need to be whole from there.
The University should be doing everything in its power with all that money they make from us fans to try to foster, re-ignite, and encourage the competition of our local football teams and improve the quality of our local talent. Clinics, camps, setting expectations, offering conditioning guidelines and scheme plans, you name it. Whatever it takes.
Look at all of the 7-on-7 leagues and intensive off-season programs and resources/activities Texas has for football. Being a football player is like a full-time deal. Do you see anything at all even remotely on this level occuring in Nebraska or the surrounding area?
As another example, I'm a huge advocate for trying to implement rugby at a greater degree at the high school level in the state of Nebraska. Don't you think that would toughen the hell out of some kids and get them accustomed to playing the kind of physical football we all love and expect to see (and miss dearly)?
Find a way to improve your local talent and encourage competitiveness! Investing some of that big money the program makes back into the local area in this manner would pay dividends.
Practically every high school in the state played a brand of football similar to what NU did during its glory years (not all with the same success, obviously, but with similar styles of play, unless the team had a QB who could really sling it). This functioned as a veritable 'farm system' for the Huskers during its best years.
Start with what you HAVE, start with your foundation, then look at what you NEED to supplement that to get what we all WANT (wins, championships).
This was our identity and what made us unique. This is what made Nebraska NEBRASKA.
You want to know why so many of these kids on the team today probably seem so erratic and anxious and on-edge? Besides the high expectations?
Because they have no place of refuge. They have no sanctuary besides each other. They are strangers in a strange land far from home where the expectations are super high and when they don't meet those expectations, it makes them feel commodified and dehumanized. They have nowhere else to turn. Although they are getting a lot from the university, a free education, a chance to wear the 'N' on the helmet (things most of us would have killed for), let's face it, it's not the same thing to most of them as it was to us, and this can lead to them understandably feeling used on some levels.
Having a team made up of largely local guys offers a built-in sanctuary as well as a litmus for what the expectations at Nebraska are. They know what the expectations are. They are used to the expectations here and how are fanbase is. They would be friends and family with them, and fans themselves for crying out loud! They could function as buffer between the fanbase and the out of area kids and make those kids from far away feel more at home. They can help them understand and appreciate what the red 'N' is all about and help them to become as passionate about it as they are. This is builds more camaraderie, unity, vision, and purpose, and most of all, an identity!
This is of all things is what has been sorely lacking with Nebraska for the past 10 years plus.
Until we get staff and administration in place that understands and appreciates this (in addition to the big money people), and can cultivate it and appropriately translate it all onto the field, I don't see Nebraska ever being truly great again for any sustained amount of time. I think that is the way it needs to be done here, they 'key to success' at Nebraska, if you will. It all starts with what you have.
This plan is fundamentally flawed, simply put you are comparing a state with over 26 million residents to one with less than 2 million... Nebraska as a state will never produce enough talented football players to fill even half of a team (at least not one that our fans would be satisfied with). In fact if we were going to go one way or the other, we would be best off not recruiting in NE at all vs. you're plan of trying to recruit most of our guys from here... No amount of high school practices will change this, we rank 37th in the country in population, if we try to do most of our recruiting from NE, our football program will be comparable to Kansas, who by the way has over 1 million more residents than we do...
The 1997 National Championship Cornhuskers football team begs to differ.
It's 2015, get with the times...
Oh, believe me, I am with the times. Have you been paying attention to Husker football in 2015?
And I never said we would produce as many talented kids as Texas.
Good, because we won't
Obviously.
What I am saying is we should be doing everything possible and looking at everything possible to maximize our local talent, and used what teams do in Texas as an example of ways we can be creative and proactive about doing that.
Waste of money for a state with only 2 "decently" sized cities, and I use the term "decent" very liberally...
We used to do things like this. It wouldn't really cost a lot or any extra money, it would be more a matter of allocation.
Nor did I ever say we should be recruiting solely Nebraska kids or fielding a team of just Nebraska kids.
Actually you did insinuate that right here, "We should be recruiting to supplement and augment the talent available to us, what we HAVE. Nebraska has ignored what IT HAS for far, far too long.
You start with what you have. You start in your backyard, obviously. But Nebraska didn't limit nor shouldn't limit its backyard to only the state of Nebraska. Nice Straw Man, though.
We should be deriving our identity as a team from what we have available to us, and add the pieces we need to be whole from there." That seems to indicate that we would supplement what "we HAVE" with talent from outside NE, unfortunately what "we HAVE" is virtually nothing from a football talent perspective. The rest of your argument confirmed this sentiment by suggesting that UN would somehow have a much better recruiting pool if they would contribute money in order to run football programs year round in the state of NE...
When I say local, I don't mean just Nebraska, I mean Missouri, Colorado, Kansas, Iowa, Wyoming, The Dakotas, etc.
Unless you plan to get 100% of the quality recruits from every state that you listed there, this plan will never produce a Nebraska team that our fans would be satisfied with.
The state with 26 million also happens to have 12 FBS programs, or about 1 per 2 million or so.
Only 5 of these teams, MAYBE, are getting the quality of recruits that NE fans expect us to have...
Which is why you supplement/augment/compliment what you have with out of state/national talent. Like I'm pretty sure I said.
Half of those teams could probably beat Nebraska right now.
Be honest, on their best day and probably not even our worst, every team on that list would have a 50/50 shot at beating NE, along with probably every FBS team in the nation, we suck, like seriously...
It is not impossible nor impractical to field a team with rosters composed with a majority of local talent. Nebraska did this for years. Good and great teams (that aren't in talent hotbeds) continue to do this today.
Again, please join me in 2015, this is no longer a viable option for Nebraska Football...
Once again, I'm right here with you in 2015 seeing Nebraska doing things that obviously are not successful and have not worked, rather than following a blueprint (although admittedly one that would need to be somewhat altered compared to the 90s) that it had success with for decades.