Case FOR Watson staying

What grand evidence do we have that the previous coaches knew what they were doing? Was it our continual great play in the run game...wait no. In fact our rush game was a historic embarassment to the Husker tradition. Must have been our ability to always keep the quarterback clean so that he could make throws down the field. Right? Wait a second, Zac Taylor was constantly getting drilled. Sam Keller left the lineup after being drilled at Texas. Joe Ganz had success because he could successfully run around, elude the rush and make something out of nothing.

So, back to the original point. Who says our previous coaches were good? Make a defense for these guys, because I don't believe one exsists.

 
I have heard all of these excuses before. Watson - and the other coaches on offense - cannot coach. That's what it comes down to. It has very little to do with the scheme. The offensive players can't block, run, throw, or catch the ball. Pretty key aspects for any offense.

Look at the defensive side. Very few of those players were recruited by the Pelinis. So how do you explain that? Why is our defense so good - with players that weren't recruited by the defensive coaches - and why is our offense so bad?

:dunno

 
I suspect at some point in the season Pelini handcuffed Watson, to let the defense try to get turnovers or win field position. While scoring was still a goal, not turning the ball over was just as important. Field goals were acceptable. So were punts.

Trick plays? Too high of a risk for turnovers.

3rd and long? QB draw and punt.

Need to pass? Throw it long...that's like a punt if it's intercepted, and if it works, we've won the lottery with a TD or in FG range. Or that roll out to the TE is usually safe. The shovel pass is also safe because if you drop it it's not a fumble.

We barely threw a medium length downfield pass at all, until Kinnie's catch when we were running out of time to play the field position game. The other one I remember is Green's pass that was badly thrown and nearly got picked at our 20. That ended Green's game, and also put a hold on standard passes for awhile.

Remember that the scoreboard read 12-10 Nebraska with 0:00 on the clock with that game plan. With a more aggressive one, we might've been 2 TDs behind. Or we certainly could've been further ahead, but when we attacked after that blocked punt we came up empty.

Watson's not all in the clear with this. Why we ran the option at all with Lee is beyond me. And I never saw much in the way of misdirection, though with Texas' speed and penetration I don't think that was going to work.

And there's the whole coaching part, not just the playcalling. Why are the QBs so untrustworthy to make us risk-adverse? Why couldn't we control the line of scrimmage? Bad form, poor effort, poor conditioning, or just not the right guys? Why so many dropped passes and failure to fight for the ball? Is there a problem with their routes? Holt and Gillylen were two of our more talented receivers, were they so uncoachable they had to be punished with benching? Why did Green look worse with every game he played?

Did the recruiting focus swing too far to the defense? Steinkuhler wants to play DT, but is it better for the team to be on the other side of the ball?

 
I am one of those people officially on the "Can Him" wagon. I don't believe for a minute that the offensive talent is as bad as this offense reflects. That tells me it's a coaching issue. I say give him a pink slip, sign his walking papers, give him a wink and a nod and send him packing. Just my opinion though.

 
I am one of those people officially on the "Can Him" wagon. I don't believe for a minute that the offensive talent is as bad as this offense reflects. That tells me it's a coaching issue. I say give him a pink slip, sign his walking papers, give him a wink and a nod and send him packing. Just my opinion though.
And it's a fair one. Something clearly has to change, and not just window dressing.

And if we find out Bo never pushed him to be conservative like this, he definitely has to go. I just don't think the style was his choice.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What grand evidence do we have that the previous coaches knew what they were doing? Was it our continual great play in the run game...wait no. In fact our rush game was a historic embarassment to the Husker tradition. Must have been our ability to always keep the quarterback clean so that he could make throws down the field. Right? Wait a second, Zac Taylor was constantly getting drilled. Sam Keller left the lineup after being drilled at Texas. Joe Ganz had success because he could successfully run around, elude the rush and make something out of nothing.

So, back to the original point. Who says our previous coaches were good? Make a defense for these guys, because I don't believe one exsists.
It's amazing how many NU fans credit Callahan as a great OC. NU's offense under Callahan for four years looked great only when we were playing a high school team "or" at garbage time (and oh boy, under Callahan we had "lots" of garbage time to help the statistics). Over and over good defenses stuffed NU like sardines.

For some reason these same NU fans usually back SW to the death. As has been shown endlessly everywhere on these forums is that SW's performance for years at CU blew big chunks more often than not. Him having maginal to bad to grossly inept offenses is not unusual for him what-so-ever.

All the more reason for hordes of NU fans wanting to keep him.....I guess. :dunno

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Watson - good guy, but not the right fit.

We need to bring someone successful in from Div 2 or somewhere with a background in the fundamentals of a tough power-run/play action game. Sure, we can still go after good receivers, but if Nebraska's gonna be 'back,' we need to go back to what has always moved the Big Red along - the big boys up front paving the way for a bruiser with the ball looking to punish any and all that dare to get in the way.

 
I posted this on the Stat's thread from the Omaha World Herald

These numbers are a little alarming especially while he was at Colorado but if you compare the 2008 and 2009 seasons, it does seem to lend some credence to the idea that attrition and injury really hurt this team offensively moreso than fans may have thought

 

These are National Rankings by the way coming straight off the NCAA's website. Feel free to check for accuracy

 

NCAA Stats

 

**I did some editing to add the in years Jay Norvell was here**

 

Colorado:

 

2000

Total Offense: 66

Scoring Offense: 77

 

2001

Total Offense: 20

Scoring Offense: 21

 

2002

Total Offense: 58

Scoring Offense: 51

 

2003

Total Offense: 66

Scoring Offense: 63

 

2004

Total Offense: 85

Scoring Offense: 81

 

2005

Total Offense: 87

Scoring Offense: 78

 

Nebraska:

 

2004 (Jay Norvell OC)

Total Offense: 69

Scoring Offense: 58

 

2005 (Jay Norvell OC)

Total Offense: 96

Scoring Offense: 67

 

2006 (Jay Norvell OC)

Total Offense: 14

Scoring Offense: 17

 

2007

Total Offense: 9

Scoring Offense: 28

 

2008

Total Offense: 12

Scoring Offense: 17

 

2009

Total Offense: 102

Scoring Offense: 80

 
huskerpilot said:
2. Callahan: I have a hard time believing that our offense in 06 & 07 (which was honestly pretty good), is a direct result of Callahan. I just can't give him that much credit. I remember complaining about some play calling back then too. However, the offense performed. With guys like Swift and descent (not great) quarterbacks we consistently had one of the best offenses in the nation. By saying Watson needs to go, you're giving Callahan a lot of credit.
Callahan was the true offensive coordinator while he was at Nebraska -- offense is what he does. Jay Norvell, Callahan's initial "offensive coordinator", quit because he didn't get to call the plays.

By saying the 06 and 07 offenses were "honestly pretty good" I think you need to give Callahan some credit.

 
bshirt said:
tmfr15 said:
What grand evidence do we have that the previous coaches knew what they were doing? Was it our continual great play in the run game...wait no. In fact our rush game was a historic embarassment to the Husker tradition. Must have been our ability to always keep the quarterback clean so that he could make throws down the field. Right? Wait a second, Zac Taylor was constantly getting drilled. Sam Keller left the lineup after being drilled at Texas. Joe Ganz had success because he could successfully run around, elude the rush and make something out of nothing.

So, back to the original point. Who says our previous coaches were good? Make a defense for these guys, because I don't believe one exsists.
It's amazing how many NU fans credit Callahan as a great OC. NU's offense under Callahan for four years looked great only when we were playing a high school team "or" at garbage time (and oh boy, under Callahan we had "lots" of garbage time to help the statistics). Over and over good defenses stuffed NU like sardines.

For some reason these same NU fans usually back SW to the death. As has been shown endlessly everywhere on these forums is that SW's performance for years at CU blew big chunks more often than not. Him having maginal to bad to grossly inept offenses is not unusual for him what-so-ever.

All the more reason for hordes of NU fans wanting to keep him.....I guess. :dunno
No truer words have ever been spoken. :star

 
I don't know about Wats. There was good article by Chatelain the OWH today.

http://omaha.com/article/20091206/BIGRED/712069805

The stats for Wats' offenses in the past just aren't that impressive. Mostly in the bottom of the Big 12 in total offense and scoring offense.

"Since 2000, Watson has been an offensive coordinator nine seasons in the Big 12. At Colorado (2000 to ’05), and at Nebraska (2007 to ’09). His standing in the Big 12 offensive rankings:

• ’00: 8th in total offense, 10th in scoring offense

• ’01: 2nd, 4th

• ’02: 9th, 9th

• ’03: 9th, 8th

• ’04: 9th, 9th

• ’05: 8th, 9th

• ’07: 5th, 8th

• ’08: 6th, 6th

• ’09: 11th, 8th "

 
Back
Top