Tweet deleted, from peoples reactions it must be a good thing it was taken down. What did the tweet say?Wonder who he got "permission" from. Can't imagine this being OKed.
https://twitter.com/BSNDOmaha/status/885183177513422848
Also it doesn't say "make the university of Nebraska great again". NCAA doesn't have a leg to stand on if you are talking violationsreally?Is it the school putting them out There? Is bookie getting money from them? If no is the answer I don't know what the violation would be.Nvd...it is a violation.Seems like an ncaa violation to me.Wonder who he got "permission" from. Can't imagine this being OKed.
https://twitter.com/BSNDOmaha/status/885183177513422848
I think people are trying to be nice, and I am too, but it looks like you're new to these discussions. Yes, this is absolutely an issue, for the same reason you can't slip recruits a crisp $100 on their visit ("they don't go to school yet") or you can't profit off of the likeness of a player (RIP, my sweet NCAA football games - and those were cartoon-like! This is a full headshot). There, I checked your two boxes - EA Sports made the game, not the schools, and the players sure weren't making any money. Still no go.Also it doesn't say "make the university of Nebraska great again". NCAA doesn't have a leg to stand on if you are talking violationsreally?Is it the school putting them out There? Is bookie getting money from them? If no is the answer I don't know what the violation would be.Nvd...it is a violation.Seems like an ncaa violation to me.Wonder who he got "permission" from. Can't imagine this being OKed.
https://twitter.com/BSNDOmaha/status/885183177513422848
I was more leaning on the side of the NCAA violation comments. Meaning the school or Bookie would have been in violation of NCAA rules. You can't give a recruit a $100 bill because that is a NCAA recruiting violation. This guy is some third party so this is more of a licensing issue.I think people are trying to be nice, and I am too, but it looks like you're new to these discussions. Yes, this is absolutely an issue, for the same reason you can't slip recruits a crisp $100 on their visit ("they don't go to school yet") or you can't profit off of the likeness of a player (RIP, my sweet NCAA football games - and those were cartoon-like! This is a full headshot). There, I checked your two boxes - EA Sports made the game, not the schools, and the players sure weren't making any money. Still no go.Also it doesn't say "make the university of Nebraska great again". NCAA doesn't have a leg to stand on if you are talking violationsreally?Is it the school putting them out There? Is bookie getting money from them? If no is the answer I don't know what the violation would be.Nvd...it is a violation.Seems like an ncaa violation to me.Wonder who he got "permission" from. Can't imagine this being OKed.
https://twitter.com/BSNDOmaha/status/885183177513422848
I don't think everyone is talking about the same kind of violations. I'm not sure Nebraska itself could be held responsible, but the guy making the shirts is in for an ugly legal process if he continues. Does it seem silly? Yes, but those are the rules.
I think the issue would be whether there is a NCAA violation that would make him ineligible to play college football. That would be something the NCAA could enforce even before Bookie steps foot on campus.BlitzFirst said:Since he is still in high school, probably pretty hard for the NCAA to flex any amount of muscle on Bookie claiming any violation.
This is what I was most fearful of when I first saw the tweet from his mom. I thought a fan had sent it to her.I think the issue would be whether there is a NCAA violation that would make him ineligible to play college football. That would be something the NCAA could enforce even before Bookie steps foot on campus.BlitzFirst said:Since he is still in high school, probably pretty hard for the NCAA to flex any amount of muscle on Bookie claiming any violation.
The issue could be if he, or a party affiliated to him, receives benefits for the sale of merchandise with his likeness.
This is what I was most fearful of when I first saw the tweet from his mom. I thought a fan had sent it to her.I think the issue would be whether there is a NCAA violation that would make him ineligible to play college football. That would be something the NCAA could enforce even before Bookie steps foot on campus.BlitzFirst said:Since he is still in high school, probably pretty hard for the NCAA to flex any amount of muscle on Bookie claiming any violation.
The issue could be if he, or a party affiliated to him, receives benefits for the sale of merchandise with his likeness.
![]()
Says IMG above him but the jersey is from last year when he was at Calabassas.I thought Bookie was at IMG.