You capture the point I am trying to make with all these posts. Selective enforcement by twitter is terrible in my mind and millions of other conservatives. Not the banning of Trump in particular. It will only galvanize and give a cause for people to come together on.
Who the f#&% listens to Kathy Griffith or whatever her name is? And who the hell would kill someone because Kathy Griffin held up a bloody head?
well good...obama didn't call for violent riots. that is better then trump did. glad we can agree on that.
2.1 million twitter followers do.
She doesnt have that much influence lol. Shes a comedian. Im sure all are following for jokes.
Is it your position that Twitter terms of service should be different based on job title when it comes to calls for violence
All of the enemies of freedom are hypocrites and liars. That's a given. They don't have standards beyond their perceived immediate advantage. But they don't respect other people. The only way to get more fair treatment is to force them. We just have to wait a while until the Rs are back in power. The Ds really don't want their to be free speech, they invented the phrase "safe space."
OH sure. So self-described D-list celebrities are permitted to encourage violence. At which list does that stop being permissible?
You didn't ask me, but you damn well better believe that's how it works. And with the current setup it should. I try to incite something. Few, if any notice (including the twitter watchdogs). When the leader of the free world, who has hundreds of thousands of goons willing to do just about anything for him incites something, it's pretty damn different. Good or bad, right or wrong, up or down, that's how the world works. It's just the way it is. But you know that...
I actually did ask you and you graciously gave your answer.