since it is a selection comitte and there aren't votes tallied, I can't understand why you wouldn't devise a mid season standings with "ties." if it was like, number three was a log jam of say Oregon, tcu, ole miss, auburn, bama, etc. I think that would help with some of the perception issues at this point. There isn't a ton separating about 8-10 spots in the standings at this point, so why bother separating it?
I completely agree. I think they could've come up with some groupings.
Group 1: 99.9999% guaranteed to be in it if they win out. Lose and they might be out. Miss St and FSU
Group 2: probably in if they win out, but if too many win out, they may not make it. Lose, and they are almost certainly out unless many others lose. Alabama, Auburn, Ole Miss, Mich St, Oregon, ND, Georgia, TCU, Kansas St
Group 3: win out, and they have a chance, but they probably need enough others above to lose to make room. Lose, and it's over. Nebraska, Ohio St, Arizona, Arizona St, East Carolina, Duke, Marshall
Group 4: Almost certainly no chance unless there is chaos.
I know I left out some teams and only quickly threw them in the groups without much thought, so don't bother attacking where I put teams, but the point is that they don't have to lock in spots with so much season left and knowing that many of these teams must lose, so just give a higher level view of where they are at.
Then again, at some point they are probably going to have to make some hard decisions, so maybe it's just as well to start now.