This is the first time I've seen a recruiting-industry person admit this.
They almost always like to say "but there are so many more three-stars, of course there are more three-stars drafted." Which is, of course, true.
But the part they usually ignore is the five-stars are supposed to be the can't-miss guys. Best of the best. There are usually 30-35 five-stars in each class. Which means there should be about the same number eligible for the draft each year.
If you got people to look at the five-stars in each recruiting class and say they have about a 50/50 chance of being a bust, no one would believe you. But it's the truth.
And the four-stars being only about a 25% chance of really panning out is interesting as well. Although there are more four-stars than draft picks so that's not quite as telling.
They almost always like to say "but there are so many more three-stars, of course there are more three-stars drafted." Which is, of course, true.
But the part they usually ignore is the five-stars are supposed to be the can't-miss guys. Best of the best. There are usually 30-35 five-stars in each class. Which means there should be about the same number eligible for the draft each year.
If you got people to look at the five-stars in each recruiting class and say they have about a 50/50 chance of being a bust, no one would believe you. But it's the truth.
And the four-stars being only about a 25% chance of really panning out is interesting as well. Although there are more four-stars than draft picks so that's not quite as telling.