The Murphinator
Active member
Arizona, Arizona State, and Utah to the Big 12 would make the most sense.
Arizona, Arizona State, and Utah to the Big 12 would make the most sense.
I would have thought the same, but the PAC-4 (or whatever the number will be) hasn't seemed to be serious about athletics for a while.I was obviously wrong, but a few years ago I thought the Big 12 was dead and the Pac 12 would become a Big 3 with the B1G and SEC. The ACC is still above the Big 12, but the gap isn't all that large imo.
It is going to be interesting to see what the Pac leftovers do. If they raid the MWC and WAC they could have a really good basketball league, but football is dead.
I'm beginning to think that the remnants of the Pac 12 join the Mountain West conference after the B1G and Big 12 expand and take many of the teams.I would have thought the same, but the PAC-4 (or whatever the number will be) hasn't seemed to be serious about athletics for a while.
I could see that, they are basically going to become a conference of time slot fillers. Late night games and probably some insane 8am/9am kickoffs. Anything to get some coinI'm beginning to think that the remnants of the Pac 12 join the Mountain West conference after the B1G and Big 12 expand and take many of the teams.
If that's 4 teams, I think that would give them a 16 team football conference.
ACC part won't happen. (at least not soon.)
Oregon is not liked by either USC or UCLA and as such those schools won't joyously accept that invite according to 1620 this morning. Also, Oregon isn't even a top 150 accredited academic institute so there's that too. Washington I can see but Oregon is, imo, a no.
Still believe the next group is the "all in" group of:
Washington, Stanford from the PAC
UNC, Miami, Notre Dame, Virginia (or Pitt) from the ACC
Maybe to reach 24, FSU and Pittsburgh (or Virginia)