Mierin
Assistant Coach
Yep totally legit. Nothing to see here, just accurate “models” proven inaccurate by the day and by the hour. Btw, all the models built in social distancing measures taken since early to mid March.
Each time they adjust the model they take new social distancing measures into account on the state level. Projections change as they receive more data and adjust based on new social distancing measures. Things have changed drastically since mid March in many states. You are also making a big assumption that when they apply the models they are creating don't take population density into account. Using Italy/NY to create the models doesn't mean they can't bring in other relevant information.
US social distancing policies
o We continue to receive feedback on the implementation status of social distancing measures. A key area of discussion is how to distinguish properly between clearly mandated actions versus recommendations. To date we have primarily focused on statewide mandates rather than actions where residents are advised or encouraged to follow, and/or when orders are only applicable to specific areas (e.g., counties with community spread) or specific sub-populations (e.g., individuals 70 and older).
o Some updates since March 31 reflect locations where these social distancing measures have been more nuanced. For instance, we now classify Kentucky having implemented school closures upon March 20. The governor had issued recommendations on March 16. Local school districts followed this recommendation, and by March 20, all 172 had closed and transitioned to remote learning.
Systems are prepping for peak so yes 37k vs 16K is off substantially. This is why governors are saying don’t have enough “x”. Reserving beds, furloughing healthcare workers because they are looking at this model. They have to prep for the peak, a peak that will never come
Do you understand confidence intervals?
Last edited by a moderator: