JJ Husker
Assistant Coach
Actually I don't think that makes sense at all, at least for me. It's an all time college team and I think the whole thought process needs to be kept in the college realm. I like to view these things as if only their college careers and style of play matter. Maybe a little out of necessity since I'm a Husker fan. It's pretty rough to put a power I or option team into a pro setting. I don't consider what they did after they left college. If that was the case then I'd have Roger Craig instead of Mike Rozier, etc. And, Frazier, Crouch, Gill etc. didn't and wouldn't have had stellar pro careers but in a college game, in their type of offense, I prefer them easily over any pure passer you can name. Simply look at their won/loss records, the offense their teams were able to generate, and what they did for their teams and it gets real clear for me. Another example- Peyton Manning. 97 Orange Bowl we make him look an unskilled hack, heck Tenn had to bring in T Martin. But, in the pros it's another story.When putting teams like this together, wouldn't it make a lot more sense to look at how they did play in the NFL? I mean the NFL teams are for the most part supposed to be fairly constant top to bottom in terms of talent. NFL teams are made up of the best of the best. If we're going to make a college team of the greats from each team, it would see that this would be a lot more comparable to the NFL than the actual college game. If we put up an offense against another college team's all time defense, it would seem that an option running QB might not be that attractive.
(Bonus points for using hack & heck back to back?)