Courtney Osborne's hit on Gabbert has been sent to Big 12 for review?

Gray Pinkel is a Tool, and if Osborne gets suspended I will drive to Dallas find Dan Beebe and kick him square in the crotch.

 
I'm telling you, I won't be surprised one bit if he's suspended. Beebe set a precedent and he's going to have to uphold it.

The key word in Martin's suspension was the word "flagrant." If they think Osborne's hit was flagrant, he'll sit.

 
I was wondering how long it would take for both Osborne and Meredith to be suspended by the Big 12. I would bet that NU is the only school that gets a player suspended for hits like this.

 
That's complete B.S. Pinkel is being a child. Always have to have tell Mommy (Beebe) about how one of his poor players got hit. What a little baby.

 
Political correctness in football. Amazing! What does Beebe think this game is? Pinkel should wear pink.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
LOL at Pinkel. Your quarterback gets right up after the play, you lose the big game Missouri fans were dying for you to win and then you pull this.

CDD6BD4FD332401E3CEAAF_Large.jpg


Come on Gary.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
i do not think coaches should be able to send in video. first, it just looks like he is being a sore loser. second, they obviously have an agenda. the big 12 should watch the games and then determine if a hit is deemed questionable and then review it.

 
sd said:
i do not think coaches should be able to send in video. first, it just looks like he is being a sore loser. second, they obviously have an agenda. the big 12 should watch the games and then determine if a hit is deemed questionable and then review it.
Click to expand...
It's not a lot different than a coach throwing the red flag on a play they want reviewed.

 
knapplc said:
sd said:
i do not think coaches should be able to send in video. first, it just looks like he is being a sore loser. second, they obviously have an agenda. the big 12 should watch the games and then determine if a hit is deemed questionable and then review it.
Click to expand...
It's not a lot different than a coach throwing the red flag on a play they want reviewed.
Click to expand...
i see the argument why coaches would be able to send in a video of an illegal hit, they would best know about it, so it is a nice self-policing system to help the big 12 out. however, it is a lot different than throwing the red flag. that has a direct impact in the game, during the game. if you want to use a red flag analogy, it is more like throwing the red flag in the fourth quarter to challenge a touchdown in the the first quarter.

that makes me wonder, why are illegal hit penalties not re-viewable? is it because every play would be reviewed, or what?

edit: knapplc, after thinking about it, i do get your analogy. because in both instances, the coaches are given latitude in helping the officials/big 12 regulate the game.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
knapplc said:
sd said:
i do not think coaches should be able to send in video. first, it just looks like he is being a sore loser. second, they obviously have an agenda. the big 12 should watch the games and then determine if a hit is deemed questionable and then review it.
Click to expand...
It's not a lot different than a coach throwing the red flag on a play they want reviewed.
Click to expand...
Very true, but that is DURING the game. I can't say pelini wouldn't have done the same thing, but this is par for the course from pinkel.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top