Archy1221
Well-known member
Again it’s not 7% of vaccinated people dying from Covid. It’s.0000009%I was just saying that wasn't the right phrase to use for 7%.
Again it’s not 7% of vaccinated people dying from Covid. It’s.0000009%I was just saying that wasn't the right phrase to use for 7%.
Yes it sounds like we were. I was responding to Another poster who brought up the hospitalization and deaths numbers of those who have been vaccinated which is why that number almost nill.Anyhow, that's not where the 7% came from. It said out of those vaccinated who got Covid (5,800), 7% were hospitalized.
Your right. At this point it’s only 99.999991% not 100%. Hope the manufactures can correct this and get better.Again, here is the post I was responding to:
From the article I previously linked:
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/04/13/986411423/a-mystery-under-study-how-why-and-when-covid-vaccines-arent-fully-protective
If you want to pretend that's statistically zero or whatever, then that's on you. I'm showing you that it's not. As I've already said, it's really good for a vaccine but it's not 100%.
Again, it's around 96%. I never said the manufacturers should do better. I was simply pointing out the current data, so not sure why you're getting wrapped around the axle about this.Your right. At this point it’s only 99.999991% not 100%. Hope the manufactures can correct this and get better.
Please tell me what is 96%, because it sure isn’t talking about the hospitalizations and/or Deaths from Covid-19 fully vaccinated individuals being 4%Again, it's around 96%. I never said the manufacturers should do better. I was simply pointing out the current data, so not sure why you're getting wrapped around the axle about this.
Please tell me why it’s 96%? That would be the topper here. You drive us down in semantics about a number from clinical data, then just toss out your own with no basis.Again, it's around 96%. I never said the manufacturers should do better. I was simply pointing out the current data, so not sure why you're getting wrapped around the axle about this.
Let’s do some back of the envelope arithmetic.Again, it's around 96%. I never said the manufacturers should do better. I was simply pointing out the current data, so not sure why you're getting wrapped around the axle about this.
The only back of the envelope math he has to do is divide the number of hospitalized people who have been fully vaccinated by the total number of people fully vaccinated. Or heck, he could just let the CDC do the math for him which they have. He will quickly realize that he has made an enormous error and should quit putting false info into the discussion.Let’s do some back of the envelope arithmetic.
According to cumulative numbers from the Covid Tracking Project in early March, the US had around 29 million confirmed cases of infection, with 515,000 deaths.
Estimates vary on the actual number of infections, but conservatively it’s likely at least 3-4 times the number of confirmed positives. Let’s call it 3:
3*29,000,000 = 87 million cases.
This would put the mortality rate at:
515,000/87,000,000 ~= 0.6%
Some research done in December roughly estimated that an adult’s odds of dying once hospitalized is around 10%. So,using this number to back-calculate your odds of being hospitalized:
0.6% * 10 = 6%.
To summarize, this would mean you have a 6% chance of being hospitalized if infected, which means...without a vaccination...your odds of avoiding hospitalization/death are around 94%.
Circling back, you have stated that a fully vaccinated individual has a 96% chance of avoiding hospitalization/death.
96% - 94% = 2%. That is the overall difference that you’re claiming the vaccine makes. I hope you’ve kept this to yourself, because we’re having enough trouble motivating people to get the shot as it is.
Please tell me what is 96%, because it sure isn’t talking about the hospitalizations and/or Deaths from Covid-19 fully vaccinated individuals being 4%
It's literally in the article I linked. I even bolded it in a previous post to make it more obvious.Please tell me why it’s 96%? That would be the topper here. You drive us down in semantics about a number from clinical data, then just toss out your own with no basis.
View attachment 18455
This entire analysis is based on your completely unsupported assumption that infections are "likely at least 3-4 times the number of confirmed positives". I could also throw out that the death totals are 3-4 times the number being reported, or any other factor if we're just throwing numbers out there.Let’s do some back of the envelope arithmetic.
According to cumulative numbers from the Covid Tracking Project in early March, the US had around 29 million confirmed cases of infection, with 515,000 deaths.
Estimates vary on the actual number of infections, but conservatively it’s likely at least 3-4 times the number of confirmed positives. Let’s call it 3:
3*29,000,000 = 87 million cases.
This would put the mortality rate at:
515,000/87,000,000 ~= 0.6%
Some research done in December roughly estimated that an adult’s odds of dying once hospitalized is around 10%. So,using this number to back-calculate your odds of being hospitalized:
0.6% * 10 = 6%.
To summarize, this would mean you have a 6% chance of being hospitalized if infected, which means...without a vaccination...your odds of avoiding hospitalization/death are around 94%.
Circling back, you have stated that a fully vaccinated individual has a 96% chance of avoiding hospitalization/death.
96% - 94% = 2%. That is the overall difference that you’re claiming the vaccine makes. I hope you’ve kept this to yourself, because we’re having enough trouble motivating people to get the shot as it is.
Number of Patients Number Hospitalized Overall Percent Hospitalized Overall
Total 7,162 1,494 21%
That’s a funny way of spelling ‘sorry, I was wrong’.This entire analysis is based on your completely unsupported assumption that infections are "likely at least 3-4 times the number of confirmed positives". I could also throw out that the death totals are 3-4 times the number being reported, or any other factor if we're just throwing numbers out there.
If we look at the actual numbers (without guessing factors) 515000/29000000 ~= 1.8% and using your estimate of dying once hospitalized, we get 1.8% * 10 = 18%.
Or we could just look at the actual numbers instead of trying to guesstimate it, here's a paper that analyzes the CDC data and breaks down the hospitalization and ICU rates by underlying medical condition. If you look at the chart on the second page, the very first line gives the totals (only copied a portion of the table):
Code:Number of Patients Number Hospitalized Overall Percent Hospitalized Overall Total 7,162 1,494 21%
So using the those numbers and your logic, that would be a vaccine improvement of 96% - 79% = 17%. That's a significant reduction in number of people that need to be hospitalized. But I'm guessing the reality is more complex than that simple subtraction.
In the end though, I'm just linking the numbers that show that claims of 100% effectiveness aren't true. In fact, it's even more important that we get as many people vaccinated with an effectiveness of less than 100% because herd immunity of those for whom the vaccine is effective will help protect the small portion for whom it's not as effective.
Whatever you need to tell yourself, I suppose.That’s a funny way of spelling ‘sorry, I was wrong’.
4% of vaccinated people DO NOT END UP IN THE HOSPITAL WITH COVID!!!!! What are you not understanding????This entire analysis is based on your completely unsupported assumption that infections are "likely at least 3-4 times the number of confirmed positives". I could also throw out that the death totals are 3-4 times the number being reported, or any other factor if we're just throwing numbers out there.
If we look at the actual numbers (without guessing factors) 515000/29000000 ~= 1.8% and using your estimate of dying once hospitalized, we get 1.8% * 10 = 18%.
Or we could just look at the actual numbers instead of trying to guesstimate it, here's a paper that analyzes the CDC data and breaks down the hospitalization and ICU rates by underlying medical condition. If you look at the chart on the second page, the very first line gives the totals (only copied a portion of the table):
Code:Number of Patients Number Hospitalized Overall Percent Hospitalized Overall Total 7,162 1,494 21%
So using the those numbers and your logic, that would be a vaccine improvement of 96% - 79% = 17%. That's a significant reduction in number of people that need to be hospitalized. But I'm guessing the reality is more complex than that simple subtraction.
In the end though, I'm just linking the numbers that show that claims of 100% effectiveness aren't true. In fact, it's even more important that we get as many people vaccinated with an effectiveness of less than 100% because herd immunity of those for whom the vaccine is effective will help protect the small portion for whom it's not as effective.