Huskerford1
Walk-on
Mods should have shut this thread down on the start of the thread. Not one realistic Husker fan misses Hughes
The board caters to all Husker fans, not just the realistic ones. Just saying...Mods should have shut this thread down on the start of the thread. Not one realistic Husker fan misses Hughes
We don't shut down threads for differing opinions. However, you're welcome to read the rules on what isn't allowed.Mods should have shut this thread down on the start of the thread. Not one realistic Husker fan misses Hughes
We also miss Kevin Cosgrove, Barney Cotton, Ross Els, and Shawn Watson.klb835 said:He knew how to stop the run. Not sure why Parella gets so much love.
We also miss Kevin Cosgrove, Barney Cotton, Ross Els, and DeShawn Watson.klb835 said:He knew how to stop the run. Not sure why Parella gets so much love.
"or posting a message for the express purpose of generating a negative response (trolling)."We don't shut down threads for differing opinions. However, you're welcome to read the rules on what isn't allowed.Mods should have shut this thread down on the start of the thread. Not one realistic Husker fan misses Hughes
http://www.huskerboard.com/index.php?/page/huskerboard_rules.html
Hank, is that You?klb835 said:klb835, on 29 Oct 2016 - 9:39 PM, said:He knew how to stop the run. Not sure why Parella gets so much love.
We've got a pretty tight idea of what trolling is. The goal is to keep things civil, without requiring lock-step allegiance from every poster."or posting a message for the express purpose of generating a negative response (trolling)."We don't shut down threads for differing opinions. However, you're welcome to read the rules on what isn't allowed.Mods should have shut this thread down on the start of the thread. Not one realistic Husker fan misses Hughes
http://www.huskerboard.com/index.php?/page/huskerboard_rules.html
I'm sure this thread was created because this person really believes Hughes is better than Parrella.I'm sure it wasn't posted for the "purpose of generating a negative response".![]()
Whatever though it generates clicks so we'll let it slide![]()
To stay on topic: Hank Hughes is/was a hack and should never have been hired in the first place. Nobody misses him.
It is actually much better than that. While we were #9 in rushing yards per game last year, our yards per carry was worse last year than this year (4.7 vs 4.43). The only reason we didn't give up many rushing yards last year was because our pass D was so bad. When teams wanted to run against us, they did.We allow 25 yds per game more this year than we did last year, when we finished #9 in rush defense nationally...
For losing our entire DL, including two NFL draft picks, that's a f'ing miracle.
And our pass D is legit good this year too. As someone who was not impressed with the defense last year, they've been so much improved.It is actually much better than that. While we were #9 in rushing yards per game last year, our yards per carry was worse last year than this year (4.7 vs 4.43). The only reason we didn't give up many rushing yards last year was because our pass D was so bad. When teams wanted to run against us, they did.We allow 25 yds per game more this year than we did last year, when we finished #9 in rush defense nationally...
For losing our entire DL, including two NFL draft picks, that's a f'ing miracle.