junior4949
All-American
So, you wouldn't hire Leavitt from South Florida because they didn't even have a friggin football program 12 years ago? That's a rediculous statement and comparison within itself! He's a hot commodity right now for good reason. He built a team from absolutely nothing. Yeah, why would any team want that?So, if Nebraska hired a Texas High School coach, then that wouldn't make any difference to you, because where he's coached, has no bearing?I don't care if he was head coach at Chadron State College. The fact of the matter is he was a head coach with all the responsibilities that come with that job for two years while Bo was an interim for one friggin game. Where he coached has no bearing. The head coach is responsible for several things coordinators and assistants are not. Experience for experience, Gill had been there done that while Bo had not. To me, this means Gill's resume was stronger for a head coaching position than Bo's. However, football coaching is just like any other job in that just because you have the better resume doesn't mean you'll get the job because the company maybe looking for something different than what you have to offer. This is what happened. We needed defense, not offense. Gill had offense to offer. We went another direction. Like I said, I'm glad TO gave the job to Bo over Gill but Gill still had the best resume with regards to a Head Coaching position.
That's a ridiculous statement within itself. First of all, Buffalo just went D-1 12 years ago, and because of what Gill's done, his accomplishments are impressive. That being said, it's a much lower tier program than those in the "power conferences". He doesn't have the pressure of teams that play in the SEC or Big 12.
Now, how Gill's resume is better than Bo's is mind boggling. Are you trying to tell me that a coach in the MAC has more pressure or responsibilities than a D Coordinator in the Big 12 or the SEC?
Not too mention, look at LSU's defense now that Bo isn't there. I know they've lost a lot, but they were supposed to have one of the better front 4's in D-1.
If someone told you you could have a coach that has been a D coordinator on two national title teams, or a coach that is attempting to build a program, who are you going to take?
I would say a MAC head coach has more responsibilities than a D Coordinator at any flippin college program in the nation. To think otherwise is foolish. A head coach is responsible for all of his cooridnators, his players, recruiting, etc. A coordinator is responsible for his side of the ball and some recruiting duties. The buck stops with the head coach. Of course they have more duties and responsibilities than a coordinator.
I guess you're going to have to show the the two national title teams Bo has been a D cooridnator on. I'm only aware of one.
Ohio State could have hired probably any D coordinator in the world, but instead they chose Tressel. I think their decision to take a proven head coach at a lower level has worked out excellent. Wouldn't you agree?
For the last time, I wanted Bo. I didn't want Gill. However to think Bo's resume was better or even comparable to Gill's, IMO is asinine. Gill had been the head man for 2 years. He'd managed an entire team. He'd managed an entire staff. Bo had managed a D one year in Nebraska. He co-managed a D at OU. He managed a D at LSU for a couple of years. Many people came on here last year claiming Bo didn't like recruiting and wasn't good at recruiting. When was he ever responsible for recruiting to get these labels? I think he's done a pretty good job of recruiting the 09' class. Gill has turned around arguably one of the worst D1 teams. Other than the 03' NU defense, what has Bo really turned around? He never reinvented the wheel at OU or LSU as both had very good D's when he took control or co-control.