Because the defense is not to fault. That one play cannot be blamed for an entire game's worth of offenseive inepticism ( i think i made that one up). 99-100 said if we hole OU to 20-24 points we win this game. hmmI've been bashing Watson, but the Pelini's were not in the zone either. Why didn't we blitz on 3rd and 24??? We gave up 23 and then the DE didn't stay home on the naked bootleg. The more I think about it, there's blame to go around.
I think Rex Burkhead should have something to say about that.We got one TD because of the defense, remember that.
Yeah, OU's first five drives lasted a minute and a half or so on average. The next drive lasted nothing because we got a pick on the first play.the reason they gave up some yards was because the offense played like crap and was on the field constantly.
So Osbornes INT did not set up a score??????I think Rex Burkhead should have something to say about that.We got one TD because of the defense, remember that.
Yeah, OU's first five drives lasted a minute and a half or so on average. The next drive lasted nothing because we got a pick on the first play.the reason they gave up some yards was because the offense played like crap and was on the field constantly.
The next two went for 80, and 71 yards, respectively. So this is incorrect. The offense was alright, we were up 17-0. The reason the defense gave up so many yards? Cassidy bites on a fake, Hagg gets beat, etc, etc. There were a few miscues amidst a sea of great play by the D, but those handful of mistakes were all very costly. Credit to OU on this to.
From then on the offense did play like crap though.
Defense AND offense are to blame.
Sometimes I think you must be Watson's brother or something the way you try to deflect all the critisicm of the offense. The fact is, if our offense shows up against Texas, A&M and OU we don't lose any of those games. Our D was on the field the whole damn night. Same as every game last year.I think Rex Burkhead should have something to say about that.We got one TD because of the defense, remember that.
Yeah, OU's first five drives lasted a minute and a half or so on average. The next drive lasted nothing because we got a pick on the first play.the reason they gave up some yards was because the offense played like crap and was on the field constantly.
The next two went for 80, and 71 yards, respectively. So this is incorrect. The offense was alright, we were up 17-0. The reason the defense gave up so many yards? Cassidy bites on a fake, Hagg gets beat, etc, etc. There were a few miscues amidst a sea of great play by the D, but those handful of mistakes were all very costly. Credit to OU on this to.
From then on the offense did play like crap though.
Defense AND offense are to blame.
The defense played very well, and you have to remember this was Oklahoma, a very good team with a potentially explosive offense. huskerscott had it right, "did you watch the game"? Turnovers and terrible offensive play calling was the reason for the loss.So Osbornes INT did not set up a score??????I think Rex Burkhead should have something to say about that.We got one TD because of the defense, remember that.
Yeah, OU's first five drives lasted a minute and a half or so on average. The next drive lasted nothing because we got a pick on the first play.the reason they gave up some yards was because the offense played like crap and was on the field constantly.
The next two went for 80, and 71 yards, respectively. So this is incorrect. The offense was alright, we were up 17-0. The reason the defense gave up so many yards? Cassidy bites on a fake, Hagg gets beat, etc, etc. There were a few miscues amidst a sea of great play by the D, but those handful of mistakes were all very costly. Credit to OU on this to.
From then on the offense did play like crap though.
Defense AND offense are to blame.
Cassidy did bite on the play action, but recovered enough to make a play on the ball.
After Tmart threw the INT into the endzone OU went 80 yards pretty quickly, Ou had the big MO at that point. Ou was 1 for 16 on 3rd down, usually when that happens your gonna win the game.
Defense did what they had to do to win the game..... Up 17-0 we gotta close the game out we didnt, OU got confident and adjusted something NU hasnt done very well.
I'm not deflecting criticism of the offense, I'm deflecting criticism of Watson. I guess that doesn't help my case, huh?Sometimes I think you must be Watson's brother or something the way you try to deflect all the critisicm of the offense. The fact is, if our offense shows up against Texas, A&M and OU we don't lose any of those games. Our D was on the field the whole damn night. Same as every game last year.I think Rex Burkhead should have something to say about that.We got one TD because of the defense, remember that.
Yeah, OU's first five drives lasted a minute and a half or so on average. The next drive lasted nothing because we got a pick on the first play.the reason they gave up some yards was because the offense played like crap and was on the field constantly.
The next two went for 80, and 71 yards, respectively. So this is incorrect. The offense was alright, we were up 17-0. The reason the defense gave up so many yards? Cassidy bites on a fake, Hagg gets beat, etc, etc. There were a few miscues amidst a sea of great play by the D, but those handful of mistakes were all very costly. Credit to OU on this to.
From then on the offense did play like crap though.
Defense AND offense are to blame.
Nebraska's defense played about as good as you could hope for against a pretty talented offensive squad. Watching this game, Nebraska had plenty of more chances to win this game offensively than they did defensively. What was extremely frustrating about this specific play, however, is that we hit the OU player at least six yard back from the first down marker, yet Amukamara (or however was tackling him) was trying to go for the strip instead of wrapping him up and tackling. It was at a point in the game too that going for the strip wasn't exactly a necessity early in the fourth. I saw many OU players getting yards after contact because we were going for strips more than just wrapping up.I've been bashing Watson, but the Pelini's were not in the zone either. Why didn't we blitz on 3rd and 24??? We gave up 23 and then the DE didn't stay home on the naked bootleg. The more I think about it, there's blame to go around.