Hit the nail on the head. I think the NFL, even if they didn't fumble their way through investigations like this, would've had a hard time proving dead to rights that Brady did something wrong. But, who knows.Good stuff, Enhance.
It seems like some wanted the NFL to have to find a "smoking gun." That was never going to happen. Still, circumstantial evidence, such as the text message logs and timeline of the ballboy in "bathroom," is still admissible evidence.
I also believe Brady cheated, and this ruling certainly doesn't rule that he did not.
I find myself in the difficult position of wanting players to see punishment but also making sure the NFL goes about it in a fair way. I don't hate Brady like a lot of people do; but, as we both believe, he cheated. It's all in hindsight now but things just weren't as slam dunk as the Spygate was, or as slam dunk as something like "Pacman" Jones slamming Amari Cooper's head into his helmet.
I gotta say though - for months, people were saying this wasn't going to tarnish Brady's legacy much. Fair or not, every time I think about him or see him in a game, Deflategate comes to mind. It has tarnished him in my eyes. Some may blame the media as people often do in highly publicized legal matters, but, I just think there's so many shady things that happened that it's hard to believe he's innocent. Impossible to believe he's innocent.
It's not like it was with Spygate where people focused on administration and Belichick. I didn't really associate that with Brady too much. But, I completely associate Brady and Deflategate together now, but maybe time will diminish this correlation.
Last edited by a moderator: