Gage County
Banned
Abandon Biden movement in full swing.
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm sure they're as non-partisan as you...Most of my family lives in Michigan. They would hurl at the thought of Whitmer. Pick someone else please.
It’s anecdotal takes like this that really dispel the “Any regular middle aged Dem would be better than Biden” mantra I endlessly see and hear. There’s plenty of perfectly suitable candidates that are run of the mill Dems and also not convicted felons, but yet we dismiss them for some benign reason. Then we wonder why we end up with candidates like Joe and Donald.Most of my family lives in Michigan. They would hurl at the thought of Whitmer. Pick someone else please.
The Dems came within a whisker of doing so in 1968. They had a terrible convention - everything in turmoil. HHH ends up wining it without winning a primary. They take on Nixon who was a far better candidate than Trump is today and HHH probably, would have, could have, won without the 3rd party candidacy of Gov Wallace who got over 9 million votes and 46 EC votes. Nixon beat Humphry by 812k votes but by 110 electoral votes.It's too late for the Dems to change candidates and still beat Trump. That needed to be done before the primaries. Switching to another candidate is a guaranteed win for Trump. Sticking with Biden is a coin flip.
I don't think that's even remotely the case in today's politics. Losing the incumbent advantage will doom the Dems unless there's an extremely charismatic young candidate (basically Obama), but the Dems don't have anyone like that or we'd have already heard of them.The Dems came within a whisker of doing so in 1968. They had a terrible convention - everything in turmoil. HHH ends up wining it without winning a primary. They take on Nixon who was a far better candidate than Trump is today and HHH probably, would have, could have, won without the 3rd party candidacy of Gov Wallace who got over 9 million votes and 46 EC votes. Nixon beat Humphry by 812k votes but by 110 electoral votes.
IF the Dems switch to a respectable ticket (no Harris on the ticket either) and Trump gets a strong sentence by the NY judge - the whole dynamic of the race can change.
The news clips I have seen today have seemed harsher than I would have thought.Abandon Biden movement in full swing.
The math only doesn't math if you ignore the overwhelming evidence that Trump is winning. Pollsters try to adjust polls by paty response ID.Shockingly, some of the snap polls after last night had show many undedicided voters thought Biden won. One was a 50/50 split of undecided voters in a county Trump won in 2020. Maybe its not as bad as it seemed. People look for different things and debates dont usually change much. Bernie won every debate imo in 2020 primaries and look what happened.
I wish things were different, but Biden is it. The math still aint mathing for Trump, no matter what polls say (btw NYT poll admitted their latest poll, republicans were more likely to answer their phones than dems and independents). He cant win if 20% of republicans dont vote for him and we are seeing real life data in every primary that shows 15-20% dont want him. The polls arent showing this. Id take the real
life data, especially that it came out during Trumls trial he paid polling companies to make them better for him in 2016. Maybe they are right, maybe not, all I know is Id vote for Bidens corpse if it meant keeping Trump away from power.
The news clips I have seen today have seemed harsher than I would have thought.
Polls also show that he is going to get more black votes than any republican president ever. Do you believe that? He might get more but hes not getting over 10%. If 15-20% of your own base vote against you, you cant win. That is why dems lost in 2016, they didnt turn out their base. He can win, Im not saying that. Just saying we have real life data that refutes the polls in nearly every primary vote so far.The math only doesn't math if you ignore the overwhelming evidence that Trump is winning. Pollsters try to adjust polls by paty response ID.
It doesn't mean that it's a perfect method, but it spills be one thing if the NYT/Sienna polls were outliers with their methodology. But when nearly every poll shows Trump winning, that's where the issue lies. Make no mistake Trump is winning and is now the overwhelming favorite to win.
People who say he can't win are just so disgusted with him (rightfully so) that it just doesn't compute with them that it's possible anybody would contemplate voting for him in the first place.
Shockingly, some of the snap polls after last night had show many undedicided voters thought Biden won. One was a 50/50 split of undecided voters in a county Trump won in 2020. Maybe its not as bad as it seemed. People look for different things and debates dont usually change much. Bernie won every debate imo in 2020 primaries and look what happened.
I wish things were different, but Biden is it. The math still aint mathing for Trump, no matter what polls say (btw NYT poll admitted their latest poll, republicans were more likely to answer their phones than dems and independents). He cant win if 20% of republicans dont vote for him and we are seeing real life data in every primary that shows 15-20% dont want him. The polls arent showing this. Id take the real
life data, especially that it came out during Trumls trial he paid polling companies to make them better for him in 2016. Maybe they are right, maybe not, all I know is Id vote for Bidens corpse if it meant keeping Trump away from power.
OK if were going to go off polls, Biden has been up in many of the national polls recently and within the MOE in most swing states. Its going to be close no matter what and a stressful day on Nov. 5th no matter what.Like Strangelove said, polls are adjusted to account for this type of thing. I.e. if they estimate Democrats are less likely to answer their phones, but they think Democrats and Republicans will vote in equal numbers, they will weight the poll as if the same # of Democrats answered their phones as Republicans.