I agree with both of you. The perception of what they are called and what they really are, are different. Neither of you are wrong. I watched an "SEC speed" team in Alabama 2 years ago, just flat out, out physical one of, if not thee most physical team in the big10 in Michigan State when Cousin's was QB. 2011 if I remember right.devnet said:So the term "SEC speed" that is thrown around by Football analysts...you know, the guys who actually understand the game of football....that's just foolin' right? Those aren't the droids we're looking for right?Not to people that actually understand the game of football
And when Nebraska was coming to the Big 10...people were worried about the size of their linebackers because the Big 10 is full of speed right? It wasn't because the Big 10 was known as a bruising and harder hitting conference than the pass happy Big 12 right? Foolin' there too eh?
These aren't my concepts...attacking them won't get under my skin...they're known concepts. Anyone who follows college football knows the stereotypes. Pretending that you know more than everyone else because you don't want to admit that there are stereotypes like this make you look uninformed and ignorant...stating what you said above adds smug to that description as well.
The comment was SEC is known for speed, not physicality. I said that was untruedevnet said:So the term "SEC speed" that is thrown around by Football analysts...you know, the guys who actually understand the game of football....that's just foolin' right? Those aren't the droids we're looking for right?Not to people that actually understand the game of football
And when Nebraska was coming to the Big 10...people were worried about the size of their linebackers because the Big 10 is full of speed right? It wasn't because the Big 10 was known as a bruising and harder hitting conference than the pass happy Big 12 right? Foolin' there too eh?
You mean all those former college coaches and former players? Isn't that your criteria for being able to discuss football? Haha...you my friend are a piece of work.Announcers and 'analysts"? Most of them are entertainers, they just get in the way IMO
They dont know a jet sweep from an "end around" or "reverse" most of the talking heads show they know very little about the game
Unfortunately that is where most "fans" get their information
If you want to know more about the game, they would be near the bottom of the list to start learning
haha, which play by play guys and announcers? Musburger with 40 years in sports? Maybe. All they do is call the play-by-play. The analysts provide the opinions we're talking about above.Its a shame most people watching the game, dont know enough about it to know they are getting poor information.
Lots of the play by play guys and announcers have never played or coached a game in their lives.
To say something that is patently 100% wrong like "THE SEC is known for speed not physicallity" is silly- I guess if the people you are asking are 25 year old girl flag football players and 12 year old boys, not people that actually watch real games and have a minimal understanding of the game.
I can see why Bo gets frustrated with all the advice he gets from the uninformed fans or why Bill Callahan would say something in an interview like 'Thats too technical for you" LOL