DOJ Initial Russia Hearings

D4m2xkqXkAAcLyW.png


 
Notre Dame Joe said:
I was trying to explain to @Nebfanatic, "collusion" is dead in the water.  You must hold CONTROL and press X before pasting "obstruction" for mad libs. 
Click to expand...
Collusion isn't a charge, conspiracy would be the charge. The report clearly outlines a relationship between Russia and the Trump campaign. Just because Mueller doesn't feel there is enough evidence to indict on conspiracy(a high bar and Mueller makes it clear in his report he won't indict Trump) doesn't mean there hasn't been concerning conduct regarding Trump and Russia. Its all outlined in the report if you would care to read. Its factual information that Russia interefered in the elections, preferred Trump as a canidate and Trump openly accepted their help. Its also factual information that TO THIS DAY Trump denies that Russia interfered in the elections even though the evidence is overwhelming. If you can read about Trumps relationship with Russia that is outlined in the report and say that its completely appropriate then maybe you aren't the patriot you think you are.

 
Notre Dame Joe said:
I was trying to explain to @Nebfanatic, "collusion" is dead in the water.  You must hold CONTROL and press X before pasting "obstruction" for mad libs. 
Click to expand...
How bout this excerpt from the report. Met with Russians to gather dirt on an opposing canidate then proceeded to cover it up. Mueller can't prove they meant to break the law, otherwise it would be against the law. In my opinion, our President shouldn't be engaging in these meetings. It might not rise to conspiracy, but its definitely not OK.

D4ck-xsWwAMhm9b.png

 
Nebfanatic said:
Collusion isn't a charge, conspiracy would be the charge. The report clearly outlines a relationship between Russia and the Trump campaign. Just because Mueller doesn't feel there is enough evidence to indict on conspiracy(a high bar and Mueller makes it clear in his report he won't indict Trump) doesn't mean there hasn't been concerning conduct regarding Trump and Russia. Its all outlined in the report if you would care to read. Its factual information that Russia interefered in the elections, preferred Trump as a canidate and Trump openly accepted their help. Its also factual information that TO THIS DAY Trump denies that Russia interfered in the elections even though the evidence is overwhelming. If you can read about Trumps relationship with Russia that is outlined in the report and say that its completely appropriate then maybe you aren't the patriot you think you are.
Click to expand...


Would you feel better if Trump paid the Russians to compile a dossier about Hilary?

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top