Sounds like the oddsmakers think the mood is that Nebraska is slightly better, but Mizzou benefits from home field. Well, they're right about one!!I expect many chages to this early proposition!
Sounds like the oddsmakers think the mood is that Nebraska is slightly better, but Mizzou benefits from home field. Well, they're right about one!!I expect many chages to this early proposition!
OOH OOH, personal attack...Nice one .... :dumdumWho cares, Missouri sucks!Your overlooking something. The game had NEVADA in it. U of N is in RENO. Lines are created to generate equal betting, not predict scores. SO what fan base to you think has a easier time placing bets. Ones that bet illegally through bookies across the country. Or ones that walk across the street to their sports book??That's carzy. Missouri was favored by 7 against Nevada! I would think that Nebraska would be favored.ower
you didnt understand. I tried to educate you. I could have said, "hey look at the re-re that doesnt know what the hell he is talking about" that might have worked better.
Depends...I agree. That was clearly a personal attack & there should be a warning.
"There is absolutely no reason to verbally attack another user (aka flaming), and/or posting a message for the express purpose of generating a negative response (trolling)."
Clearly a verbal attack on another user.
Personally, I think Fro Daddy's post is not a big deal & pretty harmless. But I saw a Husker fan get banned a week or two ago for making a similar "personal attack" which also seemed like not a big deal & harmless (told someone to quit being an bad guy or no need to be an bad guy or something like that, bad guy is the exact word he used, he did not say a$$hole). It would be very hypocritical of the mod who banned that Husker fan to not at least issue Fro Daddy a warning for making a personal attack
Almost guaranteed. Vegas isn't concerned with our game right now - they have an entire weekend of pro & college games to manage lines for, not to mention MLB is still limping through the end of its season.Again: Where are you getting a line this early? Are you just guessing?
What are the odds? Is it something I could put money on?Almost guaranteed. Vegas isn't concerned with our game right now - they have an entire weekend of pro & college games to manage lines for, not to mention MLB is still limping through the end of its season.
I'd love to see a link to this line, but odds are he just made it up.
You'd have to ask Vegas. I'm terrible with numbers.What are the odds? Is it something I could put money on?Almost guaranteed. Vegas isn't concerned with our game right now - they have an entire weekend of pro & college games to manage lines for, not to mention MLB is still limping through the end of its season.
I'd love to see a link to this line, but odds are he just made it up.
What you obviously missed, then, is that the former member made multiple personal attacks in several threads. You also obviously missed the posts prior to Fro's where members attached Missouri posters - and we didn't warn, suspend, or ban them. You also have obviously missed the fact that we try and utilize a little discretion in these matters. Fro has a history with the Board - he's been a good poster in his time here. He lost his cool on one post on one thread - he didn't, unlike the former member, go off on a tirade of insults in multiple posts in multiple threads. A big difference.I agree. That was clearly a personal attack & there should be a warning.
"There is absolutely no reason to verbally attack another user (aka flaming), and/or posting a message for the express purpose of generating a negative response (trolling)."
Clearly a verbal attack on another user.
Personally, I think Fro Daddy's post is not a big deal & pretty harmless. But I saw a Husker fan get banned a week or two ago for making a similar "personal attack" which also seemed like not a big deal & harmless (told someone to quit being an bad guy or no need to be an bad guy or something like that, bad guy is the exact word he used, he did not say a$$hole). It would be very hypocritical of the mod who banned that Husker fan to not at least issue Fro Daddy a warning for making a personal attack
You missed this part:So does this mean I can start calling any Missouri fan who makes a post I disagree with a "re-re"?
As way of clarification, that means the answer is, "It depends". If some Tiger fan comes on like "Catmanzou" who is obviously trolling, then you'll probably get away with it. That's what happened when a couple of members made personal attacks against him - in fact, at least one Missouri fan decided to try and pull the same thing you did by bringing up that there were personal attacks. You might have noticed that I also explained to that Missouri fan that the kid got what he deserved and we wouldn't take any action against the members who had attacked him.You also have obviously missed the fact that we try and utilize a little discretion in these matters.
Actually, you didn't. You referenced the action we took against another member when we banned him. In fact, that was your basis for making the accusation that not warning Fro was "hypocritical". You made a comparison between two situations, spanning multiple topics.So does this mean I can start calling any Missouri fan who makes a post I disagree with a "re-re"?
Also, I searched through this threat & couldnt find anything posted by a Husker fan that could somehow be construed as a 'personal attack' against a Missouri fan. If you were referring to other threads, I don't read every single thread on Huskerboard. Also, I only intended for my post to pertain to this thread