Cy the Cyclone
Starter
DB...especially if there are plans to try Asante as a linebacker.With that being said, what do you think the most likely position to see freshman playing time would be?
My vote goes to WR.
DB...especially if there are plans to try Asante as a linebacker.With that being said, what do you think the most likely position to see freshman playing time would be?
My vote goes to WR.
I agree with you 110%. If you look at my list of possible true freshman playing right away are linebackers and DB besides Baker. Alot of people are forgetting that we lost 4 LB's and 2-3 DB's. It's open game for anybody and Bo is going to push everybody to earn their starting spot.LB's and DB's will see the most freshman playing IMO.
Hm, I think we lost a lot of WR's. Nunn, Purify, Hardy, Erickson - that's a lot of experience and a lot of catches between the lot of them.Compton easily. We lost 4 LBs to graduation, I think him and Fisher will get a lot of playtime, possibility of starting as the season goes on. I think Baker will redshirt as we already have lots of O-linemen, and rushing a guy out isnt a good plan on the line.
I think the WRs will redshirt, we have WRs, so unless one of these guys is going to be a return man, I dont see them making the field much.
Going by the way the last couple of classes were rated, I would say there is some very good talent still left on this team, but what better chance to get playing time as a freshmen than with a new staff trying to get a new system in place. I would think that who ever works the hardest and learns the schemes is going to play. Lot easier than coming into a program with established players and a coaching staff that has worked with them for 2 or 3 years. This is the best chance for the new kids to see a lot of playing time, than the group coming in next year will have. IMOMaybe I woke up on the wrong side of the bed, and feeling a little "pissy"........but, the fact that it seemed like over 80% of this board felt that we had/have the TALENT, it was just the COACHING last season, there must be pretty good talent returning on the Defense. When this topic was discussed at nauseum after the season, many, many of the members said that NU has talent, the coaches just sucked......
with that theory, the players we have are pretty good, and it will be difficult for any "true-freshman", especially if they don't get here until June/July to replace a returning D-guy. The exception may be Baker, who is a freak.
Now, if you prescribe to the theory, that last season wasn't ONLY COACHING, and the players were partially to blame, then I think that a few spots may be up for grabs...
I guess it depends on how everyone wants to "defend" their stance of last years demise.
Sorry for the "grumpy" good morning post, but I honeslty think that I have a point. (yes, at the top of my head)
I agree with what both of you have said, but the fact is we are thin at LB and in the secondary, so I would venture a guess and say that some defensive guys will see the field. We're lacking depth, let alone playmakers at CB, so a tandem of Blue and Whitmore could be very possible (at least Whitmore as a nickle back). Also if Baker plays DL I'd expect to see him get some PT as were lacking playmakers on the defensive front as well.Maybe I woke up on the wrong side of the bed, and feeling a little "pissy"........but, the fact that it seemed like over 80% of this board felt that we had/have the TALENT, it was just the COACHING last season, there must be pretty good talent returning on the Defense. When this topic was discussed at nauseum after the season, many, many of the members said that NU has talent, the coaches just sucked......
with that theory, the players we have are pretty good, and it will be difficult for any "true-freshman", especially if they don't get here until June/July to replace a returning D-guy. The exception may be Baker, who is a freak.
Now, if you prescribe to the theory, that last season wasn't ONLY COACHING, and the players were partially to blame, then I think that a few spots may be up for grabs...
I guess it depends on how everyone wants to "defend" their stance of last years demise.
Sorry for the "grumpy" good morning post, but I honeslty think that I have a point. (yes, at the top of my head)
+1
I wouldn't expect many freshmen to start or play much.
I would agree that if you start several freshmen on defense, it would point to players being last year's problem, not coaching.
If no freshman can break into the starting lineup, that means the players were solid, but coaching was not.
Same on either side of the ball.
But opinions vary widely.
Prince is going to get his shot at RB. What he makes of it is up to him. He'll also be used all over the field, no matter if he stands out at RB or not.BigWillie, what about our current corners (West, Amukamura, Sullivan?)