ESPN coverage of U$$$$$$C...(UPDATE) USC MUSt Forfit 2004 NC title and vacate 2005 season

irieboy8

Banned
....makes me sick

everyone coming on has basicly tears in their eyes and is some bizare state of mourning like some grave grave injustice has been wronged....

the bachelor came on and said how he thinks the sancations are too harsh and compared it to miami and how it took them so long to recover after their sancations.. almost as if 'how dare they make USC struggle' due to lose of scollies...

it just didn't seem very fair/objective/honest/sincere

ESPN has too much of the colin cowherd attitude where they only focus on what they think people want to hear.....

 
Last edited by a moderator:
....makes me sick

everyone coming on has basicly tears in their eyes and is some bizare state of mourning like some grave grave injustice has been wronged....

the bachelor came on and said how he thinks the sancations are too harsh and compared it to miami and how it took them so long to recover after their sancations.. almost as if 'how dare they make USC struggle' due to lose of scollies...

it just didn't seem very fair/objective/honest/sincere

ESPN has too much of the colin cowherd attitude where they only focus on what they think people want to hear.....
IMO, these sanctions are very harsh.

You're taking away 20 scholarships and removing them from the bowls. (I'm assuming this doesn't assume the national championship game if they were to make it). That's a serious disadvantage that sets the school back a long ways. I'm all for levying punishments against schools that do wrong, but forcibly tanking a program is something I never like to see.

 
....makes me sick

everyone coming on has basicly tears in their eyes and is some bizare state of mourning like some grave grave injustice has been wronged....

the bachelor came on and said how he thinks the sancations are too harsh and compared it to miami and how it took them so long to recover after their sancations.. almost as if 'how dare they make USC struggle' due to lose of scollies...

it just didn't seem very fair/objective/honest/sincere

ESPN has too much of the colin cowherd attitude where they only focus on what they think people want to hear.....
I'm loving it. All the Ohh my gosh how could it be this harsh, you are punishing people that weren't even there when it happened bull is hilarious. If they didn't know that was a huge possibility when the investigation was announced as PC left, well they were just dumb. Sucks for the players, but seriously what did those people on air think was going to happen? Espn is just mad because they might as well have been sponsoring USC over the past decade. No amount of on air whining is going to change what they get though, so cry away. Your tears are salty and sweet espn.

 
....makes me sick

everyone coming on has basicly tears in their eyes and is some bizare state of mourning like some grave grave injustice has been wronged....

the bachelor came on and said how he thinks the sancations are too harsh and compared it to miami and how it took them so long to recover after their sancations.. almost as if 'how dare they make USC struggle' due to lose of scollies...

it just didn't seem very fair/objective/honest/sincere

ESPN has too much of the colin cowherd attitude where they only focus on what they think people want to hear.....
IMO, these sanctions are very harsh.

You're taking away 20 scholarships and removing them from the bowls. (I'm assuming this doesn't assume the national championship game if they were to make it). That's a serious disadvantage that sets the school back a long ways. I'm all for levying punishments against schools that do wrong, but forcibly tanking a program is something I never like to see.
Bowls is actually all bowls. Doesnt matter if its a MNC bowl or not, they don't go.

If they end up vacating wins from 2004 also they lose a National Championship.

Maybe they should have actually had a compliance department that did their job when their star running back started showing up in new tricked out cars, etc.

 
I guess we will see just how good a recruiter Lame kiffin is, I mean Lane, oops. Sucks to be them. I think now is the time to go raid Cali for all there 5 star recruits.

 
....makes me sick

everyone coming on has basicly tears in their eyes and is some bizare state of mourning like some grave grave injustice has been wronged....

the bachelor came on and said how he thinks the sancations are too harsh and compared it to miami and how it took them so long to recover after their sancations.. almost as if 'how dare they make USC struggle' due to lose of scollies...

it just didn't seem very fair/objective/honest/sincere

ESPN has too much of the colin cowherd attitude where they only focus on what they think people want to hear.....
IMO, these sanctions are very harsh.

You're taking away 20 scholarships and removing them from the bowls. (I'm assuming this doesn't assume the national championship game if they were to make it). That's a serious disadvantage that sets the school back a long ways. I'm all for levying punishments against schools that do wrong, but forcibly tanking a program is something I never like to see.
Bowls is actually all bowls. Doesnt matter if its a MNC bowl or not, they don't go.

If they end up vacating wins from 2004 also they lose a National Championship.

Maybe they should have actually had a compliance department that did their job when their star running back started showing up in new tricked out cars, etc.
This....

 
I guess we will see just how good a recruiter Lame kiffin is, I mean Lane, oops. Sucks to be them. I think now is the time to go raid Cali for all there 5 star recruits.

wait wasnt lane kiffin an ASSISTANT COACH at USC in and around the time of these alligations 2004

WHOOOOPSSSSSSS

:LOLtartar :facepalm:

 
NCAA delivers postseason football ban

EmailPrintComments

13

ESPN.com news services

The NCAA handed the University of Southern California a two-year postseason football ban and vacated wins in Reggie Bush's final season, among other penalties, for violations in its football, men's basketball and women's tennis programs on Thursday.

The university was put on four years' probation, while the football program was hit with a two-year postseason ban and the men's basketball team was banned for one year from the postseason, which had already been self-imposed by the school.

USC was hit with scholarship reductions in football and basketball and recruiting restrictions for the men's basketball team.

The school was fined $5,000 and forfeits its $206,200 it earned from the 2008 men's basketball tournament.

In addition the university must vacate some regular-season and postseason wins in all three involved sports.

The NCAA said its findings included "a lack of institutional control, impermissible inducements, extra benefits, exceeding coach staff limits, and unethical conduct by an assistant football coach."

The violations, which span almost four years, primarily involved "agent and amateurism issues for a former football student-athlete and a former men's basketball studen-athlete," the NCAA wrote in its report.

Last year, the NCAA bundled its Bush investigation with its look into the men's basketball program. USC imposed its own sanctions on the basketball program four months ago over its recruitment of former player O.J. Mayo by former coach Tim Floyd. Floyd was accused of giving cash to a middleman who helped steer Mayo to USC.

In their football investigation, the NCAA and investigators from the Pac-10 Conference tried to determine whether Bush and his parents took improper benefits, including an alleged rent-free residence provided by a sports marketer. Bush has not met with NCAA and Pac-10 investigators and has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing.

"I have a great love for the University of Southern California and I very much regret the turn that this matter has taken, not only for USC, but for the fans and players," Bush said in a statement.

"I am disappointed by [Thursday's] decision and disagree with the NCAA's findings. If the University decides to appeal, I will continue to cooperate with the NCAA and USC, as I did during the investigation. In the meantime, I will continue to focus on making a positive impact for the University and for the community where I live," Bush said.

The women's tennis violation involved a former student athlete using an athletics department long-distance access call to make 123 unauthorized calls to her family. The total value of the calls was more than $7,000, the NCAA said.

The football team must vacate all wins in which Bush played while ineligible, starting in December 2004. The NCAA accepted USC's self-imposed penalty of vacating all wins in which Mayo competed during the 2007-08 season.

The women's tennis program must vacate all wins in which the ineligible player competed between November 2006 and May 2009 -- a penalty which was self-imposed by USC.

USC already admitted wrongdoing with the basketball program and sanctioned itself, including a ban on postseason participation, a reduction of scholarships and vacating all of its wins from 2007-08.

USC chose to contest the allegation against the football program.

 
VIA Bruce fledma twitters

USC must vacate the 2004 BCS title game, all of 2005 season and will be reduced to 75 scholarships over a three-year span

39 minutes ago via web

Retweeted by 37 people

Reply Retweet

BFeldmanESPN

Bruce Feldman

 
Appears to be true.

ESPN College FB Blog

Turns out the NCAA did give USC the Alabama slammer. And then some.

 

The NCAA hammered USC with sanctions on Thursday, as the Trojans were banned from postseason play for two seasons, lost 30 scholarships over the next three years and must vacate all wins from December 2004 -- the BCS title game included -- through the entirety of the 2005 season.

 

USC was cited for a lack of institutional control, impermissible inducements, extra benefits, exceeding coach staff limits and unethical conduct by a running backs coach Todd McNair. Because of violations in 2001, the program also was considered a "repeat violator."

 

The penalties, USC's sixth case of major infractions since 1957, exceed in severity sanctions Alabama received in 2002 and what Washington received in 1993 -- major violations cases you can review here.

 

USC can appeal the ruling, but then it runs the risk of simply delaying the penalties further into the future.

 

The first question: Why did the NCAA hit USC so hard with sanctions?

 

Answer: It didn't buy any of USC's defenses.

 
this will be tough to crawl out from under. maybe USC should move to the SEC, plenty of teams there could give them advice on how to rebuild, only to be foiled by sanctions once again.

 
Back
Top