If Decker is healthy we are likely going to trot out the same line Cav did? Just trade Gates for Farniok.Who would have thought that putting our best athletes who grasp the scheme out as our starting 5 might work out?
I watched Wisconsins offensive line factory skit on youtube and cringed when comparing it to Cav's body of work. How that guy still has a job is laughable.
I'm referring to moves like having our 6'9" RT move to guard. It's a combination of trotting out the right fellas AND the right positions for the right guys. Greg Austin I thought was one of the largest upgrades from the previous staff.If Decker is healthy we are likely going to trot out the same line Cav did? Just trade Gates for Farniok.
Edit: I'm not a supporter of Cav by any means. But if we have Decker available we'll likely see the exact same line-up (minus Farniok/Gates.
I agree he is a huge upgrade. But other than Jameis moving to Gates spot we'll like see the same guys in the same positions.I'm referring to moves like having our 6'9" RT move to guard. It's a combination of trotting out the right fellas AND the right positions for the right guys. Greg Austin I thought was one of the largest upgrades from the previous staff.
Greg Austin I thought was one of the largest upgrades from the previous staff.
How do you know this didn’t happen under cav?Who would have thought that putting our best athletes who grasp the scheme out as our starting 5 might work.
How do you know this didn’t happen under cav?
No fan of Cav’s but I see no indication that he wasn’t playing the best 5 that know the system.
The system sucked and he sucked coaching it.
How do you know that at the beginning of the year he wasn’t the one that knew the system the best?Cav didn't have Decker starting at center at the beginning of last season. Whether that is Cav's poor evaluation or Cav's poor system, it was still a crappy decision, and he wasn't starting his 5 best linemen.
The issue was he never developed any depth. It sounded like he had his starting 5 taking all (or vast majority of) the practice reps throughout the season. So when a starter got hurt, we either found out there was someone better behind the him that never got a chance to prove he was better or there was a significant dropoff because the backup had limited practice time to develop.How do you know that at the beginning of the year he wasn’t the one that knew the system the best?
That’s a valid point that I’m not disputing.The issue was he never developed any depth. It sounded like he had his starting 5 taking all (or vast majority of) the practice reps throughout the season. So when a starter got hurt, we either found out there was someone better behind the him that never got a chance to prove he was better or there was a significant dropoff because the backup had limited practice time to develop.