Oddly enough I've never been tempted to label Barfy a "great mind." It's usually closer to "hack columnist." But I digress.
I saw that Tweet earlier and had to look about three times to make sure it wasn't from some Onion-ish site. Takes some pretty heavy rationalization to try to convince yourself that's as true as you'd apparently like it to be.
And it's interesting how quickly the excuses have gone from "Miles has to be given a chance to develop that great sophomore class he recruited" to "it's good they're gone because we're better without them."
Perhaps you could take over for him at OWH.
We've beat this drum before. Lot's of different points.
A) Yes, they could've developed further if they wouldn't have left.
----Problem is 1/2 of them left because they were mad they weren't getting it their way and the other left after admitting he slacked on D and the other left because he wasn't going to get much opp. for PT.
B) We've discussed over and over how they fit into certain roles on GOOD teams, unfortunately counting on them for major roles, led to a 12-19 season. (also can note last years record since they played a big part in that as well)
We traded Morrow for a guy who actually wants Morrow's role. Which is 10-12 minutes a game, defense & rebound ++++++++
We traded Horne for a guy who was a better shooter in HS and at least we can hope he is going to try and play defense +++++++
Still waiting on Jacobsen's replacement ---------
Still waiting on Fuller's replacement, but it will more than likely be a major plus because he could potentially contribute at least. +++++++
Lost Webster and added Nana. I think Nana could be good, but it's obviously going to be a minus in year one. -------------